Originally posted by @rbhillNot judging others ties in with what Paul wrote in Romans concerning judging others. You are not another's master, so do not quarrel over debatable matters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XeFNDRrJds
Simply shun those who will not follow Biblical instructions which are not debatable. Paul discusses this in 1 Corinthians 5.
So shun children of Satan who claim to know God.
Originally posted by @apathistThis is how you think things through: you draw a conclusion, then you mentally manipulate information to support that conclusion.
You claim to know god.
You kids with your illogic and bigotry. Thinking things through is not your strong suit!
You label those that disagree with you as bigots. You're a genius aren't you?
Originally posted by @josephwI seem to remember you starting a thread where you labelled those that disagree with you as mentally ill in some way. By your own standards of discourse and whatever you mean by "genius", do you feel it was acceptable to say that? Being lablled a bigot v being labelled as mentally ill. You think one is a better/worse thing to say in a debate than the other?
You label those that disagree with you as bigots. You're a genius aren't you?
Originally posted by @josephwshotgun projection blast! Yes, a bit, no, and barely.
This is how you think things through: you draw a conclusion, then you mentally manipulate information to support that conclusion.
You label those that disagree with you as bigots. You're a genius aren't you?
All your stories of satan come from your god source. Are you unaware that there are at least two sides to every story? At what point would you realize that your god doth protest too much?
Originally posted by @eladarMany of us are doing a great job shunning those who claim to know any god.
So shun children of Satan who claim to know God.
Originally posted by @fmfSo you're going to give apathist a pass when he labeled RB and "you kids" as bigots who's strong suit is not thinking things through, but you're going to interrogate me for something I said?
I seem to remember you starting a thread where you labelled those that disagree with you as mentally ill in some way. By your own standards of discourse and whatever you mean by "genius", do you feel it was acceptable to say that? Being lablled a bigot v being labelled as mentally ill. You think one is a better/worse thing to say in a debate than the other?
I think you're being hypocritical with a double standard, and you've added nothing of value to the discussion.
Not to mention the fact that it's the atheists that do the most labeling and name calling in this forum.
Originally posted by @wolfgang59Then shut up and get out.
Many of us are doing a great job shunning those who claim to know any god.
What you're really doing is shunning God anyway.
Originally posted by @apathistThere's only one right side of the story, and it ain't yours.
shotgun projection blast! Yes, a bit, no, and barely.
All your stories of satan come from your god source. Are you unaware that there are at least two sides to every story? At what point would you realize that your god doth protest too much?
Originally posted by @josephwI am simply asking you a question about the different standard you appear to hold for yourself when it comes to labelling people. If apathist demonstrates a similar double standard to yours, I may well tackle him on it.
I think you're being hypocritical with a double standard, and you've added nothing of value to the discussion.
Originally posted by @josephwThe question is, what level of "genius" do you think you yourself demonstrated when you labelled non-believers mentally ill. I don't see how it's hypocritical to ask you this.
So you're going to give apathist a pass when he labeled RB and "you kids" as bigots who's strong suit is not thinking things through, but you're going to interrogate me for something I said?