1. Joined
    16 Dec '04
    Moves
    97738
    05 May '05 21:22
    Originally posted by Nemesio
    I haven't heard from you. Do you understand the contradiction now?
    I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.
  2. Standard memberMaustrauser
    Lord Chook
    Stringybark
    Joined
    16 Nov '03
    Moves
    88863
    06 May '05 00:30
    Originally posted by blindfaith101
    I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.
    I assume that's why you are called BLINDfaith. Can't see it even when clearly explained.
  3. Standard memberNemesio
    Ursulakantor
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Joined
    05 Mar '02
    Moves
    34824
    06 May '05 02:12
    Originally posted by blindfaith101
    I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.
    Then you are illiterate. You lack the apparatus to recognize a contradiction when
    you see one.

    As such, you are utterly unqualified to relate any of the more complicated passages
    of the Bible to any interested potential seekers. You are unable to appreciate the
    Truth of that which you pretend to read.

    Nemesio
  4. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    06 May '05 02:34
    Originally posted by Nemesio
    Then you are illiterate. You lack the apparatus to recognize a contradiction when
    you see one.

    As such, you are utterly unqualified to relate any of the more complicated passages
    of the Bible to any interested potential seekers. You are unable to appreciate the
    Truth of that which you pretend to read.

    Nemesio
    You obviously haven't received the Holy Spirit and the secret decoder ring.
  5. Standard memberNemesio
    Ursulakantor
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Joined
    05 Mar '02
    Moves
    34824
    06 May '05 02:56
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    You obviously haven't received the Holy Spirit and the secret decoder ring.
    A secret decoder ring that makes it such that Nissan 14 and Nissan 15 are
    one in the same, or that stone blocking the tomb was both moved before
    and after the women arrived, is predicated on a lie and, as such, is by
    necessity
    not the Holy Spirit and is, instead the Devil, the Master of
    Lies and Deceit.

    Nemesio
  6. Hmmm . . .
    Joined
    19 Jan '04
    Moves
    22131
    06 May '05 04:39
    Originally posted by Nemesio
    A secret decoder ring that makes it such that Nissan 14 and Nissan 15 are
    one in the same, or that stone blocking the tomb was both moved before
    and after the women arrived, is predicated on a lie and, as such, is by
    necessity
    not the Holy Spirit and is, instead the Devil, the Master of
    Lies and Deceit.

    Nemesio
    Yep, you obviously don't have that secret decoder ring. 😀
  7. Joined
    16 Dec '04
    Moves
    97738
    10 May '05 08:25
    Originally posted by vistesd
    Yep, you obviously don't have that secret decoder ring. 😀
    I hope though that you grab hold of the Salvation that JESUS CHRIST has been offerring you.
  8. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    10 May '05 08:59
    Originally posted by Maustrauser
    Most Biblical scholars agree that the four canonical gospels were written between 70 and 100 AD.

    Matthew 70 - 100 AD
    Mark 68 - 73 AD
    Luke 80 -100 AD
    John 90 -110 AD

    And with both Matthew and Luke being more or less copies of Mark.

    My question to our RHP Biblical scholars is this. Why do fundamentalists accept testimony written between forty ...[text shortened]... ese gospels were divinely inspired and therefore inerrant, why are they sometimes contradictory?
    The evagelists who wrote the gospels did so under the authority of their teachers (i.e. Mark) Mark and a hypothesised source Q are the material used for the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) while John kind of fills in the gaps. The don't contradict ech other if you read too literally.
  9. Standard memberNemesio
    Ursulakantor
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Joined
    05 Mar '02
    Moves
    34824
    11 May '05 15:37
    Originally posted by Conrau K
    The evagelists who wrote the gospels did so under the authority of their teachers (i.e. Mark) Mark and a hypothesised source Q are the material used for the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) while John kind of fills in the gaps. The don't contradict ech other if you read too literally.
    So, can you answer the question I asked, about whether the Synoptics are correct and
    Jesus was crucified the day following the Passover Seder, or if St John is correct and
    He was crucified on the day before the Passover Seder?

    Nemesio
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree