Originally posted by mokko sigh
Leave it to men to overlook the obvious. Poor Jackie O finally got fed up with all her husbands infidelity, took on a lover (who happened to be a mafia mob boss) and lured him into killing her cheating husband. As for the cover up, women rule the world, women do not abide by cheating husbands and women are better at keeping secrets than you think. End of story.
Originally posted by mokko sigh
Leave it to men to overlook the obvious. Poor Jackie O finally got fed up with all her husbands infidelity, took on a lover (who happened to be a mafia mob boss) and lured him into killing her cheating husband. As for the cover up, women rule the world, women do not abide by cheating husbands and women are better at keeping secrets than you think. End of story.
You don't seem to understand what he is doing here, luring people
into senseless debates seeing how far the string will run.
Originally posted by mokko sigh
Leave it to men to overlook the obvious. Poor Jackie O finally got fed up with all her husbands infidelity, took on a lover (who happened to be a mafia mob boss) and lured him into killing her cheating husband. As for the cover up, women rule the world, women do not abide by cheating husbands and women are better at keeping secrets than you think. End of story.
By the way, the Samoan midgets in my theory were women with ties to the Mafia 🙄
Originally posted by Joe Fist Do you not understand or just don't care that the nature of being "ridiculous" totally obliterates any theory you are attempting to present?
Why are you attempting to get anyone to jump through this hoop with you? Your point might be interesting if you got around to making it.
Less insult and more logical argumentation may be helpful... How about asking questions of kingdanwa... then he may tilt his hand...
Originally posted by sonhouse You don't seem to understand what he is doing here, luring people
into senseless debates seeing how far the string will run.
I don't see anything senseless about it. "The King" is simply on a search for the Historical Kennedy. If we're debating truth claims about religions in this forum, we must have a criteria for discovering the historicity of those claims.
Originally posted by sonhouse You don't seem to understand what he is doing here, luring people
into senseless debates seeing how far the string will run.
Or he just read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" and he is really excited about it.
Originally posted by kingdanwa What's your evidence?
My evidence is that I am a women and as such am in the loop. We have a huge communications base and we also have a gigantic list of cheating men who are to be assasinated. What was your name again?
Originally posted by Eingaben Less insult and more logical argumentation may be helpful... How about asking questions of kingdanwa... then he may tilt his hand...
Sorry I get insulted with someone attempts to lure me on some convuluded path of discussion and take offense when they don't start with a point.
How about kingdanwa just starts his thread by saying something like:
Things aren't always as they seem. For example, JFK's death. We all know what we have read or seen but this is my theory.
I don't have any questions for him because he has not inspired any.
Originally posted by poopsiecui I don't see anything senseless about it. "The King" is simply on a search for the Historical Kennedy. If we're debating truth claims about religions in this forum, we must have a criteria for discovering the historicity of those claims.
Sucka!!
I'll offer up that we know Kennedy was not assassinated in the way Kingdanwa desribes because we have witnesses, still alive to this day, who saw it happen. For those who look back, 60 to 260 years from now, they can also trust the truth claim of those witness.
Originally posted by poopsiecui I'll offer up that we know Kennedy was not assassinated in the way Kingdanwa desribes because we have witnesses, still alive to this day, who saw it happen. For those who look back, 60 to 260 years from now, they can also trust the truth claim of those witness.
That makes sense... Eye witness claims do verify an event, especially multiple eye witness to crosscheck information.
Originally posted by Eingaben Maybe... or perhaps it was such a traumatic event that it left and indelible impression on the key, and/or critical parts of the event
Notice how I leave room for reasonable error... color of shirt I was wearing... etc... not He Was Shot Dead in His Car... or fatally wounded or whatever..
Originally posted by Eingaben Notice how I leave room for reasonable error... color of shirt I was wearing... etc... not He Was Shot Dead in His Car... or fatally wounded or whatever..
Maybe people will lie about what the remember because they loved his policy (or his American ideals). Can "American" witnesses be trusted?
31 Aug '05 19:22
The Grassy Knoll
Back to Top