Originally posted by mokkoWhat's your evidence?
sigh
Leave it to men to overlook the obvious. Poor Jackie O finally got fed up with all her husbands infidelity, took on a lover (who happened to be a mafia mob boss) and lured him into killing her cheating husband. As for the cover up, women rule the world, women do not abide by cheating husbands and women are better at keeping secrets than you think. End of story.
Originally posted by mokkoYou don't seem to understand what he is doing here, luring people
sigh
Leave it to men to overlook the obvious. Poor Jackie O finally got fed up with all her husbands infidelity, took on a lover (who happened to be a mafia mob boss) and lured him into killing her cheating husband. As for the cover up, women rule the world, women do not abide by cheating husbands and women are better at keeping secrets than you think. End of story.
into senseless debates seeing how far the string will run.
Originally posted by mokkoBy the way, the Samoan midgets in my theory were women with ties to the Mafia 🙄
sigh
Leave it to men to overlook the obvious. Poor Jackie O finally got fed up with all her husbands infidelity, took on a lover (who happened to be a mafia mob boss) and lured him into killing her cheating husband. As for the cover up, women rule the world, women do not abide by cheating husbands and women are better at keeping secrets than you think. End of story.
Originally posted by Joe FistLess insult and more logical argumentation may be helpful... How about asking questions of kingdanwa... then he may tilt his hand...
Do you not understand or just don't care that the nature of being "ridiculous" totally obliterates any theory you are attempting to present?
Why are you attempting to get anyone to jump through this hoop with you? Your point might be interesting if you got around to making it.
Originally posted by sonhouseI don't see anything senseless about it. "The King" is simply on a search for the Historical Kennedy. If we're debating truth claims about religions in this forum, we must have a criteria for discovering the historicity of those claims.
You don't seem to understand what he is doing here, luring people
into senseless debates seeing how far the string will run.
Sucka!!
Originally posted by EingabenSorry I get insulted with someone attempts to lure me on some convuluded path of discussion and take offense when they don't start with a point.
Less insult and more logical argumentation may be helpful... How about asking questions of kingdanwa... then he may tilt his hand...
How about kingdanwa just starts his thread by saying something like:
Things aren't always as they seem. For example, JFK's death. We all know what we have read or seen but this is my theory.
I don't have any questions for him because he has not inspired any.
Originally posted by poopsiecuiI'll offer up that we know Kennedy was not assassinated in the way Kingdanwa desribes because we have witnesses, still alive to this day, who saw it happen. For those who look back, 60 to 260 years from now, they can also trust the truth claim of those witness.
I don't see anything senseless about it. "The King" is simply on a search for the Historical Kennedy. If we're debating truth claims about religions in this forum, we must have a criteria for discovering the historicity of those claims.
Sucka!!
Originally posted by poopsiecuiThat makes sense... Eye witness claims do verify an event, especially multiple eye witness to crosscheck information.
I'll offer up that we know Kennedy was not assassinated in the way Kingdanwa desribes because we have witnesses, still alive to this day, who saw it happen. For those who look back, 60 to 260 years from now, they can also trust the truth claim of those witness.
2 edits
Originally posted by EingabenNotice how I leave room for reasonable error... color of shirt I was wearing... etc... not He Was Shot Dead in His Car... or fatally wounded or whatever..
Maybe... or perhaps it was such a traumatic event that it left and indelible impression on the key, and/or critical parts of the event
Originally posted by EingabenMaybe people will lie about what the remember because they loved his policy (or his American ideals). Can "American" witnesses be trusted?
Notice how I leave room for reasonable error... color of shirt I was wearing... etc... not He Was Shot Dead in His Car... or fatally wounded or whatever..