Originally posted by Coletti
kingdanwa has not said what his analogy is about. It seems that this could only apply the the historical reality of Christ, not Christ's claims of deity. So Christ's claims are irrelevant at this point.
Not quite. If we look at the Gospels (minor inconsistencies aside for now) as historical documents
as a reflection of what happened (including healings and the Resurrection), then my understanding
of the analogy is quite accurate.
Kingdanwa has not denied that Kennedy existed, you will notice. He has simply proposed an
outlandish theory which is out of concord with what we understand to be 'the facts' as per
eyewitness testimony (again, I'm staying away from photo- and cinematographic evidence for
the sake of simplicity).
Similarly, many non-literalist and non-believers find the historicity of the Gospels to be suspect
and consequently disbelieve the miraculous achievements.
If I might propose the analogy: The analogy of Kennedy's being killed by Indians in 1975 might
be akin to saying that Jesus wasn't crucified, escaped to India, and formed a society which is
still around today.
Nemesio