Originally posted by KellyJay How can you tell the difference between design and evolution?
Kelly
I think you have to answer your own question, otherwise it works against you. Great King Rat points out that we know all life forms evolved, so if we find a life form with an ear we think is designed, we have to justify thinking it is designed.
To give an analogy, if I asked whether my car was designed by humans or aliens, the answer, without even looking at it, would be 'humans'. If you think aliens designed my car then you would need to justify such a claim.
Originally posted by Great King Rat Evolution has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt. There's is not a shred of evidence for the existence of a Godlike creator. Hence, whenever a question such as Robbie's appears, the correct answer is always evolution.
I don't see how you can say it has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt when it has never been observed. Perhaps you are confusing adaptation with evilution. Nobody has ever seen one kind of animal change into a different kind of animal. That is what the theory of evilution claims.
Originally posted by twhitehead I think you have to answer your own question, otherwise it works against you. Great King Rat points out that we know all life forms evolved, so if we find a life form with an ear we think is designed, we have to justify thinking it is designed.
To give an analogy, if I asked whether my car was designed by humans or aliens, the answer, without even lookin ...[text shortened]... ld be 'humans'. If you think aliens designed my car then you would need to justify such a claim.
No. Great King Rat is saying your car was not designed at all. He is saying your car evolved from a previous vehicle over millions of years of time.
Originally posted by RJHinds I don't see how you can say it has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt when it has never been observed. Perhaps you are confusing adaptation with evilution. Nobody has ever seen one kind of animal change into a different kind of animal. That is what the theory of evilution claims.
The Instructor
Strawman alert! That is definitely NOT what the theory of evolution claims, as has been explained to you time after time.
Originally posted by Penguin Strawman alert! That is definitely [b]NOT what the theory of evolution claims, as has been explained to you time after time.
---Penguin[/b]
I am referring to the main original definition. The new definition that some use today could mean anything because it is not specific. By the new definition any change over time is evolution. I am referring to Biology and Darwin's evilution as I call it.
Originally posted by RJHinds Perhaps you are confusing adaptation with evilution.
No, you are confusing 'evilution' with 'evolution'. Learn to read.
Evolution is scientific fact.
Evilution is something you made up or stole of some other creationist.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie wow a zombie apocalypse is upon us, the dead have arisen!
where ya been fatboy?
busy boy these days m'lad. kids are all at school now so ran out of excuses to bum around the house christian bothering. knew i would miss chatting the likes of yourself and rj so did the next best thing and got a job in the mental health sector.
Originally posted by stellspalfie busy boy these days m'lad. kids are all at school now so ran out of excuses to bum around the house christian bothering. knew i would miss chatting the likes of yourself and rj so did the next best thing and got a job in the mental health sector.
LOL, where i live there used to be a huge Victorian asylum and i mean huge, acres and acres and acres Woodilee hospital, i used to visit the patients when i was a teenager, most of them were awesome, but then again, they were all doped up on liquid KOSH!
Originally posted by RJHinds I don't see how you can say it has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt when it has never been observed. Perhaps you are confusing adaptation with evilution. Nobody has ever seen one kind of animal change into a different kind of animal. That is what the theory of evilution claims.
The Instructor
No-one has ever seen a proton. Does this mean it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt that protons exist? No-one alive today has ever seen Napoleon Bonaparte. Does this mean it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt that Napoleon Bonaparte existed? I've never seen you. Does this mean it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt that you exist? No-one has ever seen a bunch of rocks "change" into a planet. Does this mean the formation of planets has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt?
Originally posted by Great King Rat No-one has ever seen a proton. Does this mean it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt that protons exist? No-one alive today has ever seen Napoleon Bonaparte. Does this mean it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt that Napoleon Bonaparte existed? I've never seen you. Does this mean it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt that you ...[text shortened]... o a planet. Does this mean the formation of planets has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt?
Something has to be seen to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. A Proton is just the name that we give to a postive electrical charge which do the actions we see. We have record that many people has seen Napoleon Bonaparte and what he did and there is a tomb for him. You see my posts which should prove to you I exist. We see the design in all of God's creations which should prove God exists. However, nobody has ever seen evilution and there is no reason to believe such a thing exists when the Creator God explains the origin of all of creation.
The Katydid’s Remarkable Hearing
10 Oct '13 09:58
Back to Top