Originally posted by googlefudge It indicates nothing of the sort.
The fact that new research indicates that the likely conditions on the early earth were [b]more hospitable to the formation of life does not mean that the previously thought to exist conditions
were too inhospitable for life to form.
You, and other creationists like you, are the ones that distort and fudg ...[text shortened]... ata to support that.
You are the ones with a history of lying at every available opportunity.[/b]
Maybe if you tell the lie often enough someone will believe that BS.
Originally posted by RJHinds I was referring to your researchers from the University of Waterloo and University of Colorado who conducted experiments in that indicated that the early atmosphere of Earth [b]could have contained up to 40 percent hydrogen—implying a possibly much more hospitable environment for the formation of prebiotic organic molecules.
This indicated that they ...[text shortened]... re monkeying with the figures to make them come out better. Praise the Lord! HalleluYah !!! 😏[/b]
that is simply a blatant lie; the link indicates nothing of the sort.
can't you read? Let me highlight the relevant bit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment
“.....
The University of Waterloo and University of Colorado conducted simulations in 2005 that indicated that the early atmosphere of Earth could have contained up to 40 percent hydrogen—implying a possibly much MORE hospitable environment for the formation of prebiotic organic molecules. (my emphasis )
...”
Perhaps you can highlight for us exactly were it “indicated that they acknowledged that it was not hospitable enough for the formation of prebiotic organic molecules”?
If anything, the link indicates the exact opposite.
Originally posted by SwissGambit It certainly may seem that way if you don't bother to look at the reasons they give for what they think.
I read their reasons, I don't have to agree with them.
Many of the reasons people give are just on opinions of others which in the
long and short can just as wrong as opinions of others.
Kelly
Originally posted by RJHinds No. If I knew I had lied to you to get Him to return, I would be too ashamed to face Him, for He is the Creator. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
But you know JC would already have known when the universe was created that you were going to lie, so there should be no problem meeting him mano y mano.
Originally posted by sonhouse But you know JC would already have known when the universe was created that you were going to lie, so there should be no problem meeting him mano y mano.
Originally posted by sonhouse Ah yes, living the religion of fear.
“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom,
And the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.
For by me your days will be multiplied,
And years of life will be added to you.
If you are wise, you are wise for yourself,
And if you scoff, you will bear it alone.”
Originally posted by RJHinds “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom,
And the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.
For by me your days will be multiplied,
And years of life will be added to you.
If you are wise, you are wise for yourself,
And if you scoff, you will bear it alone.”
(Proverbs 9:10-12 NKJV)
Like I said, the religion of fear. Great way to bring up kids. Hey kid, you are BORN into sin, so sorry about that but if you fear the lord, he will put you through hell but you will live forever after you die.
Yep, a kid would just love that right off the bat.
Originally posted by sonhouse Like I said, the religion of fear. Great way to bring up kids. Hey kid, you are BORN into sin, so sorry about that but if you fear the lord, he will put you through hell but you will live forever after you die.
Yep, a kid would just love that right off the bat.
I was taught Jesus loved me and God loved me when I was growing up in the church. We sang songs such as on this video:
The Miller-Urey experiment revisited:
12 May '12 12:50
YouTube
Back to Top