Go back
The Paluxy fossil human footprints

The Paluxy fossil human footprints

Spirituality

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Using your logic, most modern medicines would never have been discovered, nobody would have figured out how the continents moved, geology would have never been started as a science since it was so well known the Earth was 6000 years old nobody would even look for evidence otherwise which would have been one of the most stupid things ever done by the human r ...[text shortened]... e will be less and less of such arguments as time goes by so enjoy your delusions while you can.
You are apparently ignorant of the fact that Christians founded modern science.

http://www.christianity.co.nz/science4.htm

A History of Scientists who were Christians

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are apparently ignorant of the fact that Christians founded modern science.

http://www.christianity.co.nz/science4.htm

A History of Scientists who were Christians

[youtube]O_l_jw3Dc7A[/youtube]
You mean sciences like these?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_astronomy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_medicine

http://www.crystalinks.com/indiascience.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
You mean sciences like these?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_astronomy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_medicine

http://www.crystalinks.com/indiascience.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world
That's a Fact - Isaac Newton

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
That's a Fact - Isaac Newton

[youtube]IRmWXuE3MfY[/youtube]
You forget his statement "If I have seen more it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants'

Isaac Newton. HE knew there was a lot of science already done by those ancients I already mentioned. Some of it anyway.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
You forget his statement "If I have seen more it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants'

Isaac Newton. HE knew there was a lot of science already done by those ancients I already mentioned. Some of it anyway.
You mus not forget that Isaac Newton believed in the Christian God of the Holy Bible. That is really what made him a better scientist. 😏

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Man of Science, Man of God: Johann Kepler Father of Physical Astronomy

Kepler is best known for discovering the three mathematical laws of planetary motion "Kepler's Laws" that established the discipline of celestial mechanics. He also discovered the elliptical patterns in which the planets travel around the sun. At a time when the sun and other celestial bodies were still widely believed to circle the earth (geocentrism), Kepler defended Nicolaus Copernicus' theory that planets orbit the sun (heliocentrism) and sought to reconcile it with Scripture. He revolutionized scientific thought by applying physics (then considered a branch of natural philosophy) to astronomy (seen as a branch of mathematics).

An "unorthodox" Lutheran, Kepler had a deep love for Christ and the inspiration and authority of Scripture. He is frequently quoted as saying, "O God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee."

http://www.icr.org/article/science-man-god-johann-kepler/

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
[b]Man of Science, Man of God: Johann Kepler Father of Physical Astronomy

Kepler is best known for discovering the three mathematical laws of planetary motion "Kepler's Laws" that established the discipline of celestial mechanics. He also discovered the elliptical patterns in which the planets travel around the sun. At a time when the sun and other c ...[text shortened]... ng Thy thoughts after Thee." [/quote]
http://www.icr.org/article/science-man-god-johann-kepler/[/b]
You can do real science in spite of being nutter religious except where the age of the Earth is concerned. No nutter religionist can do real science in that field with the built in bias that FIRST the Earth is young, THEN go about trying to prove it.

That is not science. That is politics.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
You can do real science in spite of being nutter religious except where the age of the Earth is concerned. No nutter religionist can do real science in that field with the built in bias that FIRST the Earth is young, THEN go about trying to prove it.

That is not science. That is politics.
Dating Methods and Age of Earth

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Dinosaurs and Man Together



“Look now at the behemoth, which I made along with you;
He eats grass like an ox.
See now, his strength is in his hips,
And his power is in his stomach muscles.
He moves his tail like a cedar;
The sinews of his thighs are tightly knit.
His bones are like beams of bronze,
His ribs like bars of iron.
He is the first of the ways of God;
Only He who made him can bring near His sword.
Surely the mountains yield food for him,
And all the beasts of the field play there.
He lies under the lotus trees,
In a covert of reeds and marsh.
The lotus trees cover him with their shade;
The willows by the brook surround him.
Indeed the river may rage,
Yet he is not disturbed;
He is confident, though the Jordan gushes into his mouth,
Though he takes it in his eyes,
Or one pierces his nose with a snare.

(Job 40:15-24 NKJV)

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
[b]Dating Methods and Age of Earth

[youtube]09c_zxzh_Ns[/youtube][/b]
I started puking about 20 seconds into this so-called science video. Creation TRAINING indeed.

They used the wrong word, that should be creation brainwashing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
I started puking about 20 seconds into this so-called science video. Creation TRAINING indeed.

They used the wrong word, that should be creation brainwashing.
You are just not willing to be educated to truth and prefer to remain ignorant and believe a lie on this subject. That is a shame.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The Paluxy fossil human footprints
I saw a propaganda film on that in 1980 at ICR in El Cajon. Has any new evidence surfaced since it was thoroughly refuted by scientists?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
I saw a propaganda film on that in 1980 at ICR in El Cajon. Has any new evidence surfaced since it was thoroughly refuted by scientists?

[youtube]xbrVxrsBLuw[/youtube]
Of course, that refutation by so-called scientist has been refuted. Apparently you have been absent too long keep up with current knowledge. You have made it clear to me that you are not willing to do homework to get up to speed, but prefer to sit on your ass and dream of torturing trout in your retirement. Enjoy yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Apparently you have been absent too long keep up with current knowledge. You have made it clear to me that you are not willing to do homework to get up to speed, ...
RHP forums are like FOX: the more time you spend imbibing their content, the less you know.

Homework is most of what I do. I like it. Reading. Not videos.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Of course, that refutation by so-called scientist has been refuted. Apparently you have been absent too long keep up with current knowledge. You have made it clear to me that you are not willing to do homework to get up to speed, but prefer to sit on your ass and dream of torturing trout in your retirement. Enjoy yourself.
Let's see the refutation of the refutation then.