The Paluxy fossil human footprints

Originally posted by sonhouse
Let's see the refutation of the refutation then.

Man and Dinosaur walked the Earth together

YouTube

Dinosaurs and Humans Lived Contemporaneously

YouTube

Originally posted by Wulebgr
RHP forums are like FOX: the more time you spend imbibing their content, the less you know.

Homework is most of what I do. I like it. Reading. Not videos.

Okay, start reading here:

Answers Research Journal

https://answersingenesis.org/answers/research-journal/

Institute of Creation Research Technical Papers

http://www.icr.org/articles/search/?f_typeID=12

Journal of Creation Theology and Science

http://www.creationbiology.org/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=201240&module_id=120319

Originally posted by RJHinds
Okay, start reading here:

Answers Research Journal

https://answersingenesis.org/answers/research-journal/

Institute of Creation Research Technical Papers

http://www.icr.org/articles/search/?f_typeID=12

Journal of Creation Theology and Science

http://www.creationbiology.org/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=201240&module_id=120319

That really is the Journal of creation research and pseudoscience. There is NEVER real science in creation 'science', ONLY assertions which have been refuted time after time but like a bad mold in your bathroom, they always come back.
Because of the numbers of these asssholes they impede real science and make the US a laughing stock in the world which has passed them by so far they can only look at our dust in wonder and go back to assertions.

It is ZERO surprise to me why Asians are now making the real science discoveries in American universities, you almost never hear a Dr. Thurgood or Mr. Jones doing the discoveries, it is always the Ying How's or the Fing Gow, Phd, that now makes the journals with original work.

But that doesn't bother you at all, since you are not the 'near genius' but in fact the 'Tenth century man' and always will be.

Originally posted by sonhouse
That really is the Journal of creation research and pseudoscience. There is NEVER real science in creation 'science', ONLY assertions which have been refuted time after time but like a bad mold in your bathroom, they always come back.
Because of the numbers of these asssholes they impede real science and make the US a laughing stock in the world which has ...[text shortened]... all, since you are not the 'near genius' but in fact the 'Tenth century man' and always will be.

The woman scientist that discovered the soft tissue in the T-Rex dinosaur bones is not Asian and she is not a Creation scientist either. But she provided proof that the T-Rex is not millions of years old, which strongly supports the creation position, but not that of the evolutionists. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Man and Dinosaur walked the Earth together

Dinosaurs and Humans Lived Contemporaneously

Nope. I don't watch FAUX either. Although I kinda wish I'd been able to watch the debate. It's kinda fun watching folks try to clean up a mess that they made because their priorities are so messed up.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The woman scientist that discovered the soft tissue in the T-Rex dinosaur bones is not Asian and she is not a Creation scientist either. But she provided proof that the T-Rex is not millions of years old, which strongly supports the creation position, but not that of the evolutionists. 😏

Nobody but YEC say that is proof the bones are only thousands of years old. The real deal is the soft tissue has lasted for millions of years but you latch on any thin thread of evidence and just PRONOUNCE it young. That is not even close to being proof, just YEC assertions which are and always will be false and bogus and a matter of desperation.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Nobody but YEC say that is proof the bones are only thousands of years old. The real deal is the soft tissue has lasted for millions of years but you latch on any thin thread of evidence and just PRONOUNCE it young. That is not even close to being proof, just YEC assertions which are and always will be false and bogus and a matter of desperation.

Soft tissue in dead animals cannot last for millions of years. It is doing good to last a thousand or so years. So those T-Rex bones can't be more than a few thousand years old. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Soft tissue in dead animals cannot last for millions of years. It is doing good to last a thousand or so years. So those T-Rex bones can't be more than a few thousand years old. 😏

Did you forget we posted a reply to the creationist mantra, that the tissue can't last millions of years therefore the bones are a few thousand years old. Even though they are found buried way too deep for any flood.

It is the presence of iron that kills bacteria or keeps them from reproducing which allows the soft tissue to hang around for millions of years:

http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

But that won't bother you at all, will it, Mr 10th century man?

Originally posted by sonhouse
Did you forget we posted a reply to the creationist mantra, that the tissue can't last millions of years therefore the bones are a few thousand years old. Even though they are found buried way too deep for any flood.

It is the presence of iron that kills bacteria or keeps them from reproducing which allows the soft tissue to hang around for millions of y ...[text shortened]... /41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

But that won't bother you at all, will it, Mr 10th century man?

Iron in blood cannot preserve soft tissue for 65 million years. That must be the most ridiculous explanation the evolutionists have ever given to keep this evolution lie going. You can't be serious in believing such nonsense.

YouTube

A microscope scientist working for California State University has been fired following the discovery that a Triceratops horn still contained soft tissue complete with bone cells “that look alive”, according to a report in CBS Los Angeles. The scientist, whose analysis of the Triceratops horn was published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, is also an evangelical creationist, and claimed that the finding supports the view that Earth is 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs roamed the planet around 4,000 years ago. While the university claims the scientist, Mark Armitage, was fired for allowing his religion to interfere with his work, Armitage is suing the University for wrongful dismissal on the basis of violation to freedom of speech and academic freedom.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/scientist-dismissed-after-soft-tissue-found-dinosaur-fossil-001906#!bm8DDQ

YouTube

A team of attorneys is jumping to the defense of a scientist who was fired after making the stunning discovery of soft tissue attached to a triceratops skeleton, undermining the belief that dinosaurs roamed earth no less than 60 million years ago.

The Pacific Justice Institute said its case on behalf of Mark Armitage alleges a university official where Mark Armitage worked shouted at him, “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department!”

The suit against California State University Northridge, filed recently in Los Angeles County Superior Court against the board of trustees, alleges discrimination.

“Terminating an employee because of their religious views is completely inappropriate and illegal,” said Brad Dacus, PJI president.

“But doing so in an attempt to silence scientific speech at a public university is even more alarming. This should be a wakeup call and warning to the entire world of academia,” he said.

Armitage’s lawyers said he was at a dig in the Hell Creek formation in Montana in 2012 when he came up with “the largest triceratops horn ever unearthed at the site.”

Later, while examining the specimen under a high-powered microscope at CSUN, he discovered the soft tissue.

“The discovery stunned members of the scientific community because it indicates that dinosaurs roamed the earth only thousands of years in the past rather than going extinct 60 million years ago,” the legal team explained.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/scientist-fired-for-making-dinosaur-discovery/#hsvrXuJG4b3k82sd.99

Originally posted by RJHinds
A team of attorneys is jumping to the defense of a scientist who was fired after making the stunning discovery of soft tissue attached to a triceratops skeleton, undermining the belief that dinosaurs roamed earth no less than 60 million years ago.

The Pacific Justice Institute said its case on behalf of Mark Armitage alleges a university official where M ...[text shortened]... at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/scientist-fired-for-making-dinosaur-discovery/#hsvrXuJG4b3k82sd.99

He can make all the claims he wants about the age of dino's but the fact is there is a preservative mixed in with the soft tissue that we didn't know about, namely iron, that kills bacteria and keeps them from reproducing inside the tissue.

Of course YEC will jump on ANY faint evidence that we are only a few thousand years old.

Even in the face of evidence otherwise. This kind of scientist is into pseudoscience BECAUSE of his religious belief, he wants to bend science to prove his built in agenda not learn the truth.

He knows full well the discovery of iron in the soft tissue will inhibit the reproduction of bacteria but he chose to ignore that solid evidence in favor of his built in agenda which is not to learn new things scientifically but to bend science to his will and his agenda.

Originally posted by sonhouse
He can make all the claims he wants about the age of dino's but the fact is there is a preservative mixed in with the soft tissue that we didn't know about, namely iron, that kills bacteria and keeps them from reproducing inside the tissue.

Of course YEC will jump on ANY faint evidence that we are only a few thousand years old.

Even in the face of ...[text shortened]... which is not to learn new things scientifically but to bend science to his will and his agenda.

Iron is always present in blood, but that does not mean it has the ability to preserve soft tissue in bones for 65 million years. That is just crazy talk. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Iron is always present in blood, but that does not mean it has the ability to preserve soft tissue in bones for 65 million years. That is just crazy talk. 😏

It matters little what you believe. The truth is what counts and you have none.

Originally posted by sonhouse
It matters little what you believe. The truth is what counts and you have none.

You have no proof that iron in a body can preserve soft tissue for millions of years. So it is just your belief and your evolutionists lies against most other people that have common sense and believe the truth. 😏

The Near Genius