24 Oct '08 06:26>1 edit
Originally posted by ZahlanziYou're missing the point of the story. If the account of Adam and Eve has a philosophy, it's all about obedience and authority, not about attaining enlightenment.
how can we know what the people who wrote genesis intended? maybe it really was simply narrative. i am asking what the philosophy of the story might be. what you understand from it.
consider a painting. maybe by looking at it you might be experiencing a whole different thing than the author.
back to the thing at hand. let's consider the meaning of ation of one's mortal condition and the desire to achieve something in the short time given.
I understand there is an entire misinterpretation of this passage which gives Satan a kind of Promethean heroism for awakening humanity to scientific thought and technological progress. This, too, misses the intended meaning (although it gets kudos for creativity).
God gave a specific command, "You must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die." When Adam and Eve chose of their own free will not to obey God's command, their eyes were opened to evil. (More specifically, the difference between good and evil.)
What the story is in fact conveying is that by disobeying God evil was introduced to the world through Adam, and further, that the aboriginal problem with the entire human race, in a nutshell, is that none of us are capable of being obedient to God. It's not so much that we are tainted by Adam's own particular act of disobedience in the Garden, but that we ourselves are not capable of obeying God's will in our own lives.
Basically, all of humanity's troubles can be attributed to one thing: our problem with authority. That's the "philosophy" of Adam.