10 Jan '06 16:45>1 edit
Dawkin's nemesis was the late great Stephen Jay Gould of course. Gould believed in a concept that he called NOMA (Non-Overlapping MagesteriA) to exemplify the best possible relationship he saw between science and the world's great religions. One (science) is an empirical, evidence gathering fact-based activity and the other characterised by non-evidence based faith in traditonal belief systems, in essence "One teaches how the heavens go, the other how to go to heaven". I think I remember Gould in attempting to explain this concept of NOMA as he saw it by describing a crocodile on land versus a lion and vice-versa, one the king of his own patricular domain. The two speak different languages in short and while Gould's concillatory view is laudable the reality is we all live in societies where people foist their deluded non-sense on top of you and expect you to bow down to some god or other which is inimical to free thought. I always find Dawkins rabid anti-Catholicism interesting and I think I am right to say his father was an Anglican vicar. He is going to develop his concept of memes in the next programme apparently which he argues are analogous to genes in his famous book "The Selfish Gene" which is contentious to say the least. He is very provocative and has called memes "mind viruses". Curiously he always strikes me as having an almost evangelical air when he starts making his pronouncements and is very quick to insult people I find but this is probably how people learn by shaking their rigid world views. It is indeed a fact though I think that your religion is determined to a large degree as a result of where you are born and the belief systems you are "indoctrinated" with by your family and I agree with Dawkins however in his central point that the religions are the cause of much of the misery in the world as a result of this herd mentality. His visit to the Holy Land and meeting with Jews and Muslim leaders was particularly depressing.