Go back
The Structure of Romans

The Structure of Romans

Spirituality

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
15 Nov 18

The book most systematically outlaying the whole Christian faith is Paul's letter to Romans. The book has a structure, a scheme.

It may help some to see this structure and know WHAT aspects of the Christian Gospel are chiefly addressed in what areas.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
15 Nov 18

The epistle to the Romans by Paul.

Subject - the Gospel of God.

The Introduction is given 1:1-17 .

This section covers the subject matter in a most general way. This is what this letter is going to be about.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
15 Nov 18
1 edit

Romans - "The Gospel of God"

The Introduction is given 1:1-17 .

The next major section is on Condemnation.
This section can be broken into subjections. But it basically outlines the NEED for God's salvation.

The section on Condemnation covers 1:18-3:20.

It is of four major subsections.

Condemnation on mankind in general -1:18-32.

Condemnation on particularly self-righteous people - 2:1-18.

Condemnation on particularly religious people - 2:17-3:8

Condemnation on all the world totally - 3:9-20.

I will collapse these subsections in the next post.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
15 Nov 18
1 edit

Snoring is not allowed !

So far the structure of Romans is:

Introduction 1:1-17

Condemnation 1:18-3:20

Justification - 3:21 - 5:11

Sanctification -5:12-8:13

This is a big section with many subsections which I will outline below.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
15 Nov 18

Let me carry out the outline to the end this time. I'll come back to important subsections within major sections.

Introduction 1:1-17

Condemnation 1:18-3:20

Justification 3:21 - 5:11

Sanctification 5:12 - 8:13

Glorification 8:14-39

Selection 9:1 - 11:36

Transformation 12:1 - 15:13

Conclusion 15:14-16:27

As and if comments arise, I would like to show in what sections those issues may be dealt with.

This outline is not original. It follows the scheme of the table of contents of the Recovery New Testament.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
16 Nov 18
1 edit

I have a question for you sonship.

Is the content of this thread your own idea, your own intellectual property, or have you seen it elsewhere by another author (whom you are not giving credit to) and are now relaying it in this this forum?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
16 Nov 18
5 edits

@divegeester

Did you read the post immediately before your question? It contained this comment:

This outline is not original. It follows the scheme of the table of contents of the Recovery New Testament.

Many people for centuries have outlined the book of Romans well. I find this outline very good.

AS INDICATED it is not 100% my original invention.

Address any complaints about my usage of it to -

Living Stream Ministry
2431 W. La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801
United States of America

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
16 Nov 18

@sonship said
@divegeester

Did you read the post immediately before your question? It contained this comment:

This outline is not original. It follows the scheme of the table of contents of the Recovery New Testament.

Many people for centuries have outlined the book of Romans well. I find this outline very good.

AS INDICATED it is not 100% my or ...[text shortened]... ream Ministry
2431 W. La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801
United States of America [/quote]
I did not see that comment no, but clearly my suspicion that this thread content is not your own work was correct.

Well done for being honest about it on this occasion; I would have more respect for you if you clearly credit your sources in every thread.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
16 Nov 18
4 edits

@divegeester

Well done for being honest about it on this occasion;


You're a liar.

I have always been upfront about who are my influences.
For your fake congratulations I have to return an insult.
Sorry. But I will not allow you to falsely accuse me of trying to impress ANYONE with my originality.

Stop LYING about it.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
16 Nov 18

@sonship said
@divegeester
Well done for being honest about it on this occasion;


You're a liar.

I have always been upfront about who are my influences.
For your fake congratulations I have to return an insult.
Sorry. But I will not allow you to falsely accuse me of trying to impress ANYONE with my originality.

Stop LYING about it.
Ok, insult ignored.

Let’s move forward in this new frame of your openness and clarity of your sources.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
16 Nov 18
3 edits

@divegeester

Let’s move forward in this new frame of your openness and clarity of your sources.


There is no "new frame of your openness and clarity of your sources".

You've nothing but old tricks, old tactics, old slanders, old lies and going around in your old libelous circles.

Do you think I covet your respect?
I don't.

I prefer to end our exchanges right here for good.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
16 Nov 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
You've nothing but old tricks, old tactics, old slanders, old lies and going around in your old libelous circles.
Do you think I covet your respect?I don't.
I prefer to end our exchanges right here for good.
Tough day?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
16 Nov 18
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester

Get your timer out so you can make some issue of the length of the time interval.
I'll simply wait until there is someone worth conversing with on the OP.
That is worth conversing with period here.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
16 Nov 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
@divegeester

Get your timer out so you can make some issue of the length of the time interval.
I'll simply wait until there is someone worth conversing with on the OP.
That is worth conversing with period here.
Ok, no probs.
Let’s wait and see who interested in your thread about stuff by another author.

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
Clock
16 Nov 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
Ok, no probs.
Let’s wait and see who interested in your thread about stuff by another author.
I'm interested.

He's not negative, like you.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.