Originally posted by dj2beckerDo you not recall the thread where I pointed out two explict contradictions?
It speaks volumes if you are unable to counter anything written in the Bible.
Do you recall not having a reasonable response to them?
Do you now admit that the Bible is not internally consistent?
If not, then Howard is right: you have no original thought.
Nemesio
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by NemesioI do recall some gramatical inconsistency, by way of your interpretation.
Do you not recall the thread where I pointed out two explict contradictions?
Do you recall not having a reasonable response to them?
Do you now admit that the Bible is not internally consistent?
If not, then Howard is right: you have no original thought.
Nemesio
I recall clearing out the inconsistency, but I also recall you insisting upon you being right and me being wrong.
Originally posted by dj2beckerThe grammatical 'inconsistency' was in the original Greek and is 'smoothed
I do recall some gramatical inconsistency, by way of your interpretation.
I recall clearing out the inconsistency, but I also recall you insisting upon you being right and me being wrong.
out' by fallacious English translations. This is not an 'interpretation:' this is
a fact. Any 'clearing out' you did was done by sticking your head in the sand
and denying that the Greek said what it really and indisputably said.
In other words, you kept insisting that I was intolerant of your asserting the
linguistic equivalent of 2+2=5. Certainly, you cannot fault me for my lack of
desire to relent on your absurdity.
Nemesio
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by NemesioI still cannot see how your "grammatical error" even if it really is one, changes anything to the total message.
The grammatical 'inconsistency' was in the original Greek and is 'smoothed
out' by fallacious English translations. This is not an 'interpretation:' this is
a fact. Any 'clearing out' you did was done by sticking your head in the sand
and denying that the Greek said what it really and indisputably said.
In other words, you kept insisting that ...[text shortened]... . Certainly, you cannot fault me for my lack of
desire to relent on your absurdity.
Nemesio
If you have two people claiming to have hear a gunshot, with the one claiming it happened before 9 'o clock and the other claiming it happened after 9 o'clock, it doesn't change the fact that they both heard a gunshot...
Originally posted by dj2beckerOr was it a firecracker , or a car back firing , or a nail gun ?
I still cannot see how your "grammatical error" even if it really is one, changes anything to the total message.
If you have two people claiming to have hear a gunshot, with the one claiming it happened before 9 'o clock and the other claiming it happened after 9 o'clock, it doesn't change the fact that they both heard a gunshot...
Originally posted by NicolaasOK Nick, you never responded to my request for more information on these points:
lets dont lose track ppl.
God is the source and essence of the subjective state of 'I-ness' called Enlightenment.
God is the radical subjectivity of Self-realization.
Could you clarify that, I'm genuinely interested in what you have to say.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nagego to http://www.god-truths.com/
OK Nick, you never responded to my request for more information on these points:
God is the source and essence of the subjective state of 'I-ness' called Enlightenment.
God is the radical subjectivity of Self-realization.
Could you clarify that, I'm genuinely interested in what you have to say.
i think you'll find the answers there, i'm almost sure of it
Originally posted by Bosse de Nagewhat further more can i say than what is there. i totally agree with every line.
I'd prefer to hear directly from you. Otherwise I'll be forced to conclude that you are incapable of explaining these "truths" and therefore know not of what you speak.
They were written by someone else.
Originally posted by NicolaasThe web page you referred me to is obviously the source of your cut & paste job as it repeats the same statements verbatim. You agree with them but cannot explain them; you do not know what they mean.
what further more can i say than what is there. i totally agree with every line.
They were written by someone else.
Originally posted by aardvarkhomeI agree with the question however, how can they supply u with this as they have nothing apart from BLIND FAITH!!!
Could we have some evidence for these trite assertions
1 q. why would a God wait 4 billion years before creating us? all i can see he/she must have a lot of time on their hands lol