ok sry its called the two split thoery and it goes like this
1) Results of the two-split experiment shows that waves become matter when observed.
2) The two-split experiment shows that waves exist when not observed.
3) God / Allah is supposed to observe EVERYTHING, including two-split exepriments.
4) Since waves exist, they are not being observed.
5) It follows that God / Allah does not exist, since, if he / she / it did exist, then waves should not exist.
this is false
1)first
however the fact that they exist when they are not obsevered proves theory wrong because in order for this to be known. they would have to observe it. thus proving the thoery wrong because, they cant prove that it exists while not being observed while all the while observing waves to prove that they exist while not being observed. they cant prove it with out observing it. so the thoery only proves itself wrong
2) second
waves do exist while being obsevered or we would not know what they look like or that they exist so god could observe them and they still exist
3) third
the two split theory, is a thoery so its not proven and thus cant be true because as we have seen it is wrong
4) god does exist
Originally posted by curly13Why don't you simplify it and be more honest at the same time.
this is false
1)first
however the fact that they exist when they are not obsevered proves theory wrong because in order for this to be known. they would have to observe it. thus proving the thoery wrong because, they cant prove that it exists while not being observed while all the while observing waves to prove that they exist while not being observed. the ...[text shortened]... y so its not proven and thus cant be true because as we have seen it is wrong
4) god does exist
1) I believe that God exists and if I come across any claim that he doesn't whether I understand it or not I will say anything however nonsensical to try and disprove said claim. I will also listen to arguments for my position and repeat them to others without actually thinking about them myself.
If you want an analysis of why most of your post is nonsense I, and others, would be glad to oblige. I assume however, that you are not really interested in knowing whether or not you are talking sense.