There is no “eternal son”

-Removed-

I think you don't know the scriptures and are making it up as you go.

-Removed-

You are wise to not worry about denominational dogma, but dogma is a good thing if your dogma is based on truth which shouldn't change every time the wind blows.

-Removed-

Truth is very singular, while errors and lies are broad and manifold. It is exacting for something to be true; by definition, it is, or not; waver, you are off the mark. So dogma is a truth that you hold on to; there is nothing wrong with that; if your 'truths' are constantly in flux, what are you basing your faith on because faith requires something to believe in some trustworthy evidence. Which I think is one of the reasons I think Atheism has a hard time with specifics; how do you prove nothing was responsible for everything?

-Removed-

You do say some things worthy of a thumbs up now and then.

-Removed-

Naw, not even a little bit.

-Removed-

Do you think I'm in the habit of giving untruthful opinions when I express mine? Of course, it was my truthful opinion. What kind of question was that?

-Removed-

I guess it is to be expected when you live with an ever-changing point of view, and I'm telling you it should be static because truth doesn't change only opinions.