1. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    27 Jul '12 00:49
    Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
  2. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29845
    27 Jul '12 01:05
    Originally posted by JS357
    Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
    I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.
  3. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    27 Jul '12 01:45
    Originally posted by FMF
    I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.
    A fact is that which is the case. -- Wittgenstein, sort of.

    The OP is a mask of a corresponding fact, in the manner that truths correspond to facts.

    My wife has a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails (plus his own tail) holding a gilded mask, that is mounted on a little rod, in front of his face. The mask can be swung aside. This reveals that the mask is of the tiger-headed man's face, except that the mask is gilded. (This statue has some relevance to my wife's personality.) So a mask may be an accurate representation of its bearer. Therefor, saying my OP masquerades as fact does not in itself invalidate the OP. QED.
  4. Subscriberdivegeester
    reality bites
    variable
    Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    86726
    27 Jul '12 05:00
    Originally posted by JS357
    Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
    Evidence dear JS... ev-i-dence?

    Neeeext!
  5. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29845
    27 Jul '12 05:0679 edits
    Originally posted by JS357
    A fact is that which is the case. -- Wittgenstein, sort of.

    The OP is a mask of a corresponding fact, in the manner that truths correspond to facts.

    My wife has a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails (plus his own tail) holding a gilded mask, that is mounted on a little rod, in front of his face. The mask can be swung aside. This reveals bearer. Therefor, saying my OP masquerades as fact does not in itself invalidate the OP. QED.
    Nowhere in my post did I mention a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails. or anything like it, you are simply introducing more irrelevancies and you will now explain exactly why you are introducing more irrelevancies, because that is what you are doing, introducing more irrelevancies, you can not deny it , and you will now explain both why you did it, and why you deny it ,
  6. Standard membermenace71
    Can't win a game of
    38N Lat X 121W Lon
    Joined
    03 Apr '03
    Moves
    140352
    27 Jul '12 05:11
    Until they post LOL





    Manny
  7. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    27 Jul '12 06:35
    Originally posted by JS357
    Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
    I can only repeat, this thread is not about the JWs.

    One time in about 1980 my closest sister in age and I were at a sibs reunion with our 3 older sibs, who were all 10+ years older than us, and so never had much use for us while they were arguing amongst themselves.

    We secretly decided to see if we could get them talking about canned fish.

    We did it.
  8. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    27 Jul '12 09:321 edit
    LOL, we are very amused by such parody, 😀 never the less, such reverse psychology
    only serves as a further vehicle for the promulgation of Biblical truths, for we cannot
    hide our love away!
  9. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14251
    27 Jul '12 09:43
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    LOL, we are very amused by such parody, 😀 never the less, such reverse psychology
    only serves as a further vehicle for the promulgation of Biblical truths, for we cannot
    hide our love away!
    I think the OP made it clear that this thread is not about JWs. Please try to stay on topic, Robbie.
  10. Standard memberRajk999
    Enjoying
    On the Beach
    Joined
    04 Apr '04
    Moves
    170571
    27 Jul '12 13:23
    Originally posted by JS357
    Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
    Careful about trying to make prophesies. They can turn out to be false.
  11. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12734
    27 Jul '12 14:02
    Originally posted by FMF
    I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.
    Bravo! A very good assessment.
  12. Joined
    11 Oct '04
    Moves
    5232
    27 Jul '12 15:08
    Originally posted by JS357
    Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
    another Epic FAIL.

    But all part of my plan

    muhahahaha.....
  13. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    27 Jul '12 16:16
    Originally posted by Rank outsider
    another Epic FAIL.

    But all part of my plan

    muhahahaha.....
    ""Fail" is the name of a popular Internet meme where users superimpose a caption, often the word "fail" or "epic fail", onto photos or short videos depicting unsuccessful events or people falling short of expectations".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_fail#Internet_memes

    Whether something is a fail depends on the actual expectations, if there are any.
  14. Joined
    11 Oct '04
    Moves
    5232
    27 Jul '12 16:42
    Originally posted by JS357
    ""Fail" is the name of a popular Internet meme where users superimpose a caption, often the word "fail" or "epic fail", onto photos or short videos depicting unsuccessful events or people falling short of expectations".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_fail#Internet_memes

    Whether something is a fail depends on the actual expectations, if there are any.
    its not about meme
  15. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    27 Jul '12 17:08
    Originally posted by JS357
    I can only repeat, this thread is not about the JWs.

    One time in about 1980 my closest sister in age and I were at a sibs reunion with our 3 older sibs, who were all 10+ years older than us, and so never had much use for us while they were arguing amongst themselves.

    We secretly decided to see if we could get them talking about canned fish.

    We did it.
    your secret plan to get us talking about canned fish won't work.
Back to Top