This thread is not about the JWs

Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.

Originally posted by JS357
Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.

I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.

Originally posted by FMF
I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.

A fact is that which is the case. -- Wittgenstein, sort of.

The OP is a mask of a corresponding fact, in the manner that truths correspond to facts.

My wife has a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails (plus his own tail) holding a gilded mask, that is mounted on a little rod, in front of his face. The mask can be swung aside. This reveals that the mask is of the tiger-headed man's face, except that the mask is gilded. (This statue has some relevance to my wife's personality.) So a mask may be an accurate representation of its bearer. Therefor, saying my OP masquerades as fact does not in itself invalidate the OP. QED.

Originally posted by JS357
Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.

Evidence dear JS... ev-i-dence?

Neeeext!

Originally posted by JS357
A fact is that which is the case. -- Wittgenstein, sort of.

The OP is a mask of a corresponding fact, in the manner that truths correspond to facts.

My wife has a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails (plus his own tail) holding a gilded mask, that is mounted on a little rod, in front of his face. The mask can be swung aside. This reveals bearer. Therefor, saying my OP masquerades as fact does not in itself invalidate the OP. QED.

Nowhere in my post did I mention a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails. or anything like it, you are simply introducing more irrelevancies and you will now explain exactly why you are introducing more irrelevancies, because that is what you are doing, introducing more irrelevancies, you can not deny it , and you will now explain both why you did it, and why you deny it ,

Until they post LOL





Manny

Originally posted by JS357
Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.

I can only repeat, this thread is not about the JWs.

One time in about 1980 my closest sister in age and I were at a sibs reunion with our 3 older sibs, who were all 10+ years older than us, and so never had much use for us while they were arguing amongst themselves.

We secretly decided to see if we could get them talking about canned fish.

We did it.

LOL, we are very amused by such parody, 😀 never the less, such reverse psychology
only serves as a further vehicle for the promulgation of Biblical truths, for we cannot
hide our love away!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, we are very amused by such parody, 😀 never the less, such reverse psychology
only serves as a further vehicle for the promulgation of Biblical truths, for we cannot
hide our love away!

I think the OP made it clear that this thread is not about JWs. Please try to stay on topic, Robbie.

Originally posted by JS357
Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.

Careful about trying to make prophesies. They can turn out to be false.

Originally posted by FMF
I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.

Bravo! A very good assessment.

Originally posted by JS357
Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.

another Epic FAIL.

But all part of my plan

muhahahaha.....

Originally posted by Rank outsider
another Epic FAIL.

But all part of my plan

muhahahaha.....

""Fail" is the name of a popular Internet meme where users superimpose a caption, often the word "fail" or "epic fail", onto photos or short videos depicting unsuccessful events or people falling short of expectations".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_fail#Internet_memes

Whether something is a fail depends on the actual expectations, if there are any.

Originally posted by JS357
""Fail" is the name of a popular Internet meme where users superimpose a caption, often the word "fail" or "epic fail", onto photos or short videos depicting unsuccessful events or people falling short of expectations".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_fail#Internet_memes

Whether something is a fail depends on the actual expectations, if there are any.

its not about meme

Originally posted by JS357
I can only repeat, this thread is not about the JWs.

One time in about 1980 my closest sister in age and I were at a sibs reunion with our 3 older sibs, who were all 10+ years older than us, and so never had much use for us while they were arguing amongst themselves.

We secretly decided to see if we could get them talking about canned fish.

We did it.

your secret plan to get us talking about canned fish won't work.