- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
27 Jul 12
Originally posted by FMFA fact is that which is the case. -- Wittgenstein, sort of.
I think your OP is mere self-certified opinion masquerading as fact.
The OP is a mask of a corresponding fact, in the manner that truths correspond to facts.
My wife has a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails (plus his own tail) holding a gilded mask, that is mounted on a little rod, in front of his face. The mask can be swung aside. This reveals that the mask is of the tiger-headed man's face, except that the mask is gilded. (This statue has some relevance to my wife's personality.) So a mask may be an accurate representation of its bearer. Therefor, saying my OP masquerades as fact does not in itself invalidate the OP. QED.
27 Jul 12
79 edits
Originally posted by JS357Nowhere in my post did I mention a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails. or anything like it, you are simply introducing more irrelevancies and you will now explain exactly why you are introducing more irrelevancies, because that is what you are doing, introducing more irrelevancies, you can not deny it , and you will now explain both why you did it, and why you deny it ,
A fact is that which is the case. -- Wittgenstein, sort of.
The OP is a mask of a corresponding fact, in the manner that truths correspond to facts.
My wife has a little statue of a tiger-headed man dressed in tails (plus his own tail) holding a gilded mask, that is mounted on a little rod, in front of his face. The mask can be swung aside. This reveals bearer. Therefor, saying my OP masquerades as fact does not in itself invalidate the OP. QED.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
27 Jul 12
Originally posted by JS357I can only repeat, this thread is not about the JWs.
Just to make it clear, this thread is not about the JWs.
One time in about 1980 my closest sister in age and I were at a sibs reunion with our 3 older sibs, who were all 10+ years older than us, and so never had much use for us while they were arguing amongst themselves.
We secretly decided to see if we could get them talking about canned fish.
We did it.
27 Jul 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think the OP made it clear that this thread is not about JWs. Please try to stay on topic, Robbie.
LOL, we are very amused by such parody, 😀 never the less, such reverse psychology
only serves as a further vehicle for the promulgation of Biblical truths, for we cannot
hide our love away!
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
27 Jul 12
Originally posted by Rank outsider""Fail" is the name of a popular Internet meme where users superimpose a caption, often the word "fail" or "epic fail", onto photos or short videos depicting unsuccessful events or people falling short of expectations".
another Epic FAIL.
But all part of my plan
muhahahaha.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_fail#Internet_memes
Whether something is a fail depends on the actual expectations, if there are any.
27 Jul 12
Originally posted by JS357its not about meme
""Fail" is the name of a popular Internet meme where users superimpose a caption, often the word "fail" or "epic fail", onto photos or short videos depicting unsuccessful events or people falling short of expectations".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_fail#Internet_memes
Whether something is a fail depends on the actual expectations, if there are any.
27 Jul 12
Originally posted by JS357your secret plan to get us talking about canned fish won't work.
I can only repeat, this thread is not about the JWs.
One time in about 1980 my closest sister in age and I were at a sibs reunion with our 3 older sibs, who were all 10+ years older than us, and so never had much use for us while they were arguing amongst themselves.
We secretly decided to see if we could get them talking about canned fish.
We did it.