Originally posted by avalanchethecatI was going to say something similar.
While some people believe there is a god, there is really no reason for a theory of everything to take the existence thereof as a given. In fact, it seems to me that if the existence of god is accepted, the rest of the theory is kind of redundant anyway.
It implies that "god" is the complete thing itself. To talk about "it" would place "it" outside of the paradigm.