Originally posted by DoctorScribbles 5) Grace is a sufficient condition for salivation.
6) According to the Catholic Catechism, hell is literally a lake of fire.
7) Catholics have bigger Bibles than Protestants.
8) The Spirituality ex Debates forum is an aesthetic blemish.
9) The Bible is written so that even the simple minded ["that means retardeds"] can understand i ...[text shortened]... lares a falsehood, because belief in Jesus is not actually a sufficient condition for salvation.
1. False
2. I was truant
3. Undecidable, but if his nomination for FW Pope is credible, he's a Cardinal over at FW.
4. No, the strong atheist makes the claim that there is no god, and presumably has some evidence in favour of this claim.
5. No, that's chicken tikka masala, cigarettes or Starrman's avatar.
Originally posted by DoctorScribbles So far, the results of this experiment have been quite enlightening. Let's give it another day before I present my conclusions.
1) F
2) F -- an educated guess. I believe "discipline" was one of the later lessons
3) F -- or so he claims
4) F
5) T -- Grace was also a necessary condition for salvation, if I remember correctly
6) T
7) T -- The apochrypha (sp?)
8) T -- in the opinion of the Doctor
9) F, IMO
10) T, IMO
Originally posted by DoctorScribbles I have prepared a short quiz to help us review some things that we have learned through our spiritual debates.
Please answer each item True or False, and offer any elaborations that you feel are necessary. Note that some may be trick questions.
1) The General Argument from Evil requires the specification of a particular moral theory.
2) ...[text shortened]... lares a falsehood, because belief in Jesus is not actually a sufficient condition for salvation.
1) T
2) dunno
3) dunno
4) sorta T but weak atheism does as well... also other factors
5) dont believe in salvation
6) what no brimstone?
7) never c ounted the pages
8) F
9) Very F, most scholars cant agree on much of it
10) depends on your beliefs :-P