Go back
Was Jesus Gay?

Was Jesus Gay?

Spirituality

a
M.U.T.I

Joined
16 Oct 07
Moves
4028
Clock
14 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

According to the U.S. Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) contains a passage which includes the following text. --

"And the youth, looking upon him (Jesus), loved him and beseeched that he might remain with him. And going out of the tomb, they went into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days, Jesus instructed him and, at evening, the youth came to him wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

Interesting.

n

Joined
14 May 03
Moves
89724
Clock
14 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

He batted for both.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
Clock
14 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by abnoxio
Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".
I wonder what that is a euphemism for.

s

Joined
28 Aug 07
Moves
3178
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by abnoxio
According to the U.S. Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) contains a passage which includes the following text. --

"And the youth, looking ...[text shortened]... with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

Interesting.
You are a pervert mind. They were playing chess... nothing more

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by serigado
They were playing chess... nothing more
I wonder what opening Jesus used.

s

Joined
28 Aug 07
Moves
3178
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Conrau K
I wonder what opening Jesus used.
Bishop's Opening. Jesus trusts in his lackeys to do the job.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by serigado
Bishop's Opening. Jesus trusts in his lackeys to do the job.
Now we know why Jesus told his disciples to leave their wives and follow him.

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Teenage silliness!

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
15 Feb 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Teenage silliness!
What teenager alive today was also doing field research in 1958?

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
What teenager alive today was also doing field research in 1958?
What's this, a riddle?

UzumakiAi

Joined
30 Dec 07
Moves
9905
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by abnoxio
According to the U.S. Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) contains a passage which includes the following text. --

"And the youth, looking ...[text shortened]... with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

Interesting.
Does it matter if he was? Jesus being gay shouldn't change anything for religious Christians (but it would).

And anyway... I don't interpret it that way.

a
M.U.T.I

Joined
16 Oct 07
Moves
4028
Clock
15 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UzumakiAi
Does it matter if he was? Jesus being gay shouldn't change anything for religious Christians (but it would).

And anyway... I don't interpret it that way.
It would be so much easier for Christians and Christianity if they could somehow accept homosexuality. I know that some very liberal sects have, but when you do you have no choice to to stray from a literal interpretation of scripture. Which is probably a good idea anyway.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
Clock
16 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by abnoxio
According to the U.S. Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) contains a passage which includes the following text. --

"And the youth, looking ...[text shortened]... with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

Interesting.
These verses do not suggest anything gay. As with gnostic texts, one which claims that Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene on the lips, the sexual innuendo actually represents a spiritual intimacy. In this passage, the sexual connotation suggests roundaboutly that Jesus conveyed unique spiritual knowledge denied to other disciples.

j

Joined
02 Aug 06
Moves
12622
Clock
16 Feb 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by abnoxio
It would be so much easier for Christians and Christianity if they could somehow accept homosexuality. I know that some very liberal sects have, but when you do you have no choice to to stray from a literal interpretation of scripture. Which is probably a good idea anyway.
Why are you suggesting the "easier" way should be taken? We know that the way of discipleship will not be easy.

a
M.U.T.I

Joined
16 Oct 07
Moves
4028
Clock
16 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Conrau K
These verses do not suggest anything gay. As with gnostic texts, one which claims that Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene on the lips, the sexual innuendo actually represents a spiritual intimacy. In this passage, the sexual connotation suggests roundaboutly that Jesus conveyed unique spiritual knowledge denied to other disciples.
Yes it's true that apocryphal and gnostic texts are up for interpretation, just as the canonical. But my question is why are the canonical taken seriously while most mainstream Christians view these texts ( apocryphal and gnostic ,as well as gospels that were tossed out such as the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Peter....etc) as heresy? Because of the Council of Nicaea's decision? Do people even understand this? Perhaps, and I find it likely, that Christianity started early a gnostic sect. And chips.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.