17 May '05 22:08>
Since we appear to have defined the ideas of Weak, Meek, Bleak Atheism and indeed Stron and Wrong Atheism, are there any non-believers out there who would like to extend such definitions to Amuffysim?
Originally posted by StarrmanNot exactly a response to your post in the terms you requested, but since Muffyism as that term is being bandied about in this forum is theism (of an eccentric variety, but theism nonetheless) by another name, Amuffyism=Atheism and the same analyses are applicable.
Since we appear to have defined the ideas of Weak, Meek, Bleak Atheism and indeed Stron and Wrong Atheism, are there any non-believers out there who would like to extend such definitions to Amuffysim?
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesThere are no non-believers of Muffy. If you believe it is Wednesday then you believe in Muffy. If you believe in the God of the Christians then you also believe in Muffy. God and Wednesday are living proof of the existence of Muffy.
Let Shaved Muffism refer to the belief that when you shave away all the rhetoric and get a good look at the meat of what you're dealing with in this theology, you'll see that Muffy is nothing more than a seductive temptress, quite possibly the very same one that appeared as a serpent in Eden. They both have lips, after all.