Originally posted by black beetleShut it numbsack. The man is making an honest attempt to answer the question.
Poor divegester:'(
How hard to live keeping in mind that the lurking extremist fundamentalist atheists are ready to strap a bomb to your sleeve taking your heart with it:'(:'
Do you see around atheists trying to establish the Word of the Antichrist too?
😵
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou have not demonstrated any such 'loss of standards and values'.
You have not demonstrated any such 'loss of standards and values'.
The precision with which those buildings were constructed to this day still confounds engineers of all stripes. Only you are unimpressed.
References to those confounded engineers please, and references to the actual precision. I am willing to bet that the precision does not ...[text shortened]... every sentence. The man is an open sewer.[/b]
You clearly have not read one of his books.[/b]
Where did I claim to have done so? At this point, it's just an unsubstantiated statement. Why not point out that I'm not speaking French, as well? It would be just as relevant.
References to those confounded engineers please, and references to the actual precision. I am willing to bet that the precision does not as you claim exceed all modern day structures.
Either your studies suffer from a serious lack of sufficiency, or you're just being coy. Whichever, I will not dignify the ignorance of your insinuation that the issue is somehow in question.
You clearly have not read one of his books.
Sounds good as a parting shot. Too bad you don't have any way of backing up your claim, or disqualifying mine.
-Removed-Everybody is a philosopher my friend, some are good and some are not I reckon🙂
It seems to me that the Human invented the concept of the religion because of his ignorance; then, considering that this idea should be justified, he used his fantasy and cooked up the differ religious doctrines accordingly😵
Originally posted by FreakyKBHFair enough.
Where did I claim to have done so? At this point, it's just an unsubstantiated statement. Why not point out that I'm not speaking French, as well? It would be just as relevant.
Sounds good as a parting shot. Too bad you don't have any way of backing up your claim, or disqualifying mine.
It is quite easy to disqualify yours. Simply quote for us one sentence from "The selfish gene" then explain to me why you think that "spew of hatred and invective" is apparent in that sentence. You claimed it was in nearly every sentence and you have a whole book to look through. Lets see how you do.
What amazes me after looking up Galileo on Wikipedia is that he seems that everything he stood for and is known for is exactly the opposite of your own philosophies.