Originally posted by LemonJelloYou're right, of course. I was using "know" loosely to mean "strongly believe".
I largely agree, but I wonder sometimes why we should stipulate that the liar knows that P. Why should we not weaken it to he believes that P? This opens the possibility to lies the propositional contents of which are true, which may seem awkward. But on the other hand, I don't really see why the person who believes that P and intentionally trie ...[text shortened]... an you give me some reasons why I should restrict the lie concept to only false content?