Originally posted by sonhouse Luckily, there are less and less of your kind of assshole as each year that goes by. In 100 years there will be so few of you, there will not even be a glimmer of hope of making laws suppressing science.
I have said nothing about making laws suppressing science. You must have gotten that from your wild imaginations or a bad dream. In fact, I enjoy how science keeps validating the Holy Bible, 😏
Originally posted by RJHinds I have said nothing about making laws suppressing science. You must have gotten that from your wild imaginations or a bad dream. In fact, I enjoy how science keeps validating the Holy Bible, 😏
Biblical Inspiration Validated By Science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vx-WDLe-2Sk
When you force creationism to be taught in a classroom full of malleable kids you are suppressing science. Pure and simple. You would be forcing religion to dictate what is science and what is not. EXACTLY like what is going on with the Boko Haram (which means 'no western education' in Arabic) except you wouldn't be killing the bodies of the children like they do, only their minds.
Originally posted by sonhouse When you force creationism to be taught in a classroom full of malleable kids you are suppressing science. Pure and simple. You would be forcing religion to dictate what is science and what is not. EXACTLY like what is going on with the Boko Haram (which means 'no western education' in Arabic) except you wouldn't be killing the bodies of the children like they do, only their minds.
As I have said before, I am not suggesting that creationism be forced to be taught in the science classroom. The suggestion is that only proven science be taught and the lies of evolution and billions of year be removed from the textbooks.
Only if that is not acceptable, would I suggest that creationism be taught as an alternate theory along with evolution.
Originally posted by RJHinds As I have said before, I am not suggesting that creationism be forced to be taught in the science classroom. The suggestion is that only proven science be taught and the lies of evolution and billions of year be removed from the textbooks.
Only if that is not acceptable, would I suggest that creationism be taught as an alternate theory along with evolution.
Creationism is not a theory sir, it's the delirious ramblings of a man sat on by a gorilla.
Originally posted by RJHinds As I have said before, I am not suggesting that creationism be forced to be taught in the science classroom. The suggestion is that only proven science be taught and the lies of evolution and billions of year be removed from the textbooks.
Only if that is not acceptable, would I suggest that creationism be taught as an alternate theory along with evolution.
So you would not consider removing evolution from school curriculums as religious suppression? That would be EXACTLY what I am talking about, in your mind it would be nothing. In the rest of the world, it would be suppression of science. What would be next? Geology? Can't have that false teaching showing Earth to be 4 billion years old, no sir, Off with its head! Nuclear science? All that fake age determinations? Off with its head. Ok, we are left with English, Math, and oh, lots of sports so what is your bitch?
Originally posted by sonhouse So you would not consider removing evolution from school curriculums as religious suppression? That would be EXACTLY what I am talking about, in your mind it would be nothing. In the rest of the world, it would be suppression of science. What would be next? Geology? Can't have that false teaching showing Earth to be 4 billion years old, no sir, Off with its ...[text shortened]... with its head. Ok, we are left with English, Math, and oh, lots of sports so what is your bitch?
You are just creating straw man arguments now. Don't you have anything better? 😏
Originally posted by sonhouse Now you are truly dipping into the mire of delusion. You really think your minority view speaks for the whole world? Even YOU can't think that.
The fool that does not believe God is in a strong delusion.
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Originally posted by RJHinds [b]The fool that does not believe God is in a strong delusion.
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 KJV)[/b]
So, God makes them deluded, and then damns them for being so?
Originally posted by RJHinds God does not make them deluded. God sends them a strong delusion to believe a lie, because they have already rejected the truth. 😏
What is DNA?
09 Jul '15 23:202 edits
YouTube
Back to Top