Originally posted by knightmeister
I don't think your claim is "BS" (as you put it) , what I notice is that you have used a fruit as your centrepiece.
Now if you had created an orange God of some sort who could permeate the universe with an objective "orangeness" that would have been different. If you had said that your orange God was able to vindicate and justify all values of ora tent with the idea of OMFs , because God can vindicate those values - oranges can't.
Let me correct you KM, God is,
by your definition, not irrelevant; and this is a
belief on your part.
I however do not share this belief. The only definition I would (charitably) assign to a god (be it yours or any other) is that it is in some way supernatural (and either it exists or does not exist). I have no reason or arguments presented to me that would
force me, logically, to draw any further assumptions from this premise. I have no reason to rule out the possibility that any god is a total b***ard, that it is a liar, that it needs help from another entity creating universes, that it plays no part in creating universes, that it has an aversion to chewing gum, that it is constrained by certain (possibly supernatural) laws, that it is female, that it isn't omnipotent, etc...
Also, if you hold to the position you do that good is what God believes is good then you completely trivialise the notion of goodness (since as (I think) AthousandYoung elegantly stated in the other thread, baby rape is "good" if your god, (unknown to you, and assuming for argument's sake it exists) believes this to be so)
Your claim that uppercase 'G' Christian god is objective morality is an assertion you make as being self evidently true. This line of thought however, applies only to you and other Christians that share your view (
ie: not me). You cannot then argue that I must, logically, find discomfort and absurdaties with my position in the conclusions which follow; since from the outset,
I didn't accept your premise!
To explain this, if a person (due to a cute division by zero argument) believes it obviously true that 2=1, it is not valid they conclude *I* am forced to accept all maths is trivial given all collections of things, and all numbers/ quantities are equal. (Since I don't accept 2=1)
Only you (and those who share your position) believe
"God is coherent and consistent with the idea of OMFs"
I don't.
One more edit:
...But a fruit. I fail to see how such an insignificant piece of organic matter coild actually create the conditions for an OMF.
I fail to see how creators of universes create the conditions for an OMF