1. Standard memberDarfius
    The Apologist
    Joined
    22 Dec '04
    Moves
    41484
    05 Apr '05 23:07
    Originally posted by aardvarkhome
    reptile have lungs or are you being deliberately stupid?
    The type of lungs, my friend.
  2. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    06 Apr '05 16:20
    In order to pursue this topic a little further with honesty, I will suggest something which strengthens the creationist hypothesis a little bit.

    As I understand it, the creationist hypothesis claims the first birds came into being fully formed, as opposed to evolving from another life form. From that point on, evolution took place, but it was only "horizontal" or "downward" evolution which never resulted in "an increase in information". Now this last sentence is a major point of weakness in the creationist position, but I have addressed that elsewhere and am willing to do so again elsewhere - it's not what I want to talk about here.

    Possibly the reason that Archaeopteryx did not have full bird lungs is that it lost them in a "loss of information" evolutionary event. Now, assuming that's the case, again, how does a scientist know if a particular species is a descendent of the bird "kind" and not some other "kind"? What are the "kinds"? Can someone provide a list?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree