Originally posted by neil67d
Robbie,
I don't know how to quote you in my post, so will have to do this slowly.
Your first paragraph deciphered says,
'what we enjoy in chess is the triumph of intellect and genius over lack of imagination'
That seems fair enough.
'The triumph of imagination over materialism', where does that come from? Do you know how to formulate a logical argument ...[text shortened]... just ain't on.
I suggest you are deliberately using mystification to confuse the issue.
well my dear friend, if you know anything about it, you will note that in former times persons were merely concerned with what was material, thus in disciplines like art, just by way of example, painting lets say, what you get is the imitation of nature, thus if you visit the national gallery you will see great landscapes, portraits, still lifes etc etc, nothing but the imitation of nature was seen as the pinnacle of endeavour, then, the artist gets the idea, through engaging his intellect and imagination, that he can express something more, his thoughts, his dreams, his desires , thus through his mind he has, transcended the material and engages in expression of the self and then even beyond that, to thoughts and abstraction.
so you see, its neither illogical nor unsubstantiated as you have, well rather hurriedly tried to assert.
i suggest you engage your imagination before making moves on the chess board.