Originally posted by galveston75 Your quite possesed aren't you Rajjjjjjjjjjjjjj? I tell you what...WE are going to stop spending millions of hours yearly on what you should be doing so you can take over for us since it seems in your pure and unadultraited eyes we are so wrong. Go ahead, the floor is yours.
i think obsessed is the term Galvo my friend, he obviously secretly desires to be a Witness 🙂
Originally posted by robbie carrobie why don't you tell the people what we actually do? why don't you tell the people, why you don't do it?
because the thread is not "absolutely all things about JW's". for now we are simply discussing the things you cannot do, things that in our humble opinion you should do.
i don't really care about the no alcohol theory. even if jesus provided hooch at the cana wedding so he can't have been too set up against it. not to mention it would be naive to think he didn't drink some himself. in moderation as any christian or human in general should.
tell me for example where does it say you can't accept blood donations? it would be pretty silly if your daughter, god forbid, would die for not getting blood, and you find out later the watchtower doesn't even have a bible quote to base this rule upon.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie the first one is triple unadulterated pure bull, if that were the case i could not go to a chess club, i could not go to the gym? in fact i would need to isolate myself from the rest of society and live like a hermit. Glavo could not go to his racket ball club or anything, its just pure bull, who wrote that garbage?
you are a heretic and a very bad JW.
wait till the elders hear about your abominable actions.
Originally posted by galveston75 Your quite possesed aren't you Rajjjjjjjjjjjjjj? I tell you what...WE are going to stop spending millions of hours yearly on what you should be doing so you can take over for us since it seems in your pure and unadultraited eyes we are so wrong. Go ahead, the floor is yours.
he didn't say that yet. he simply posted some rules he got from a site. let's discuss those and try to keep the ad hominems to a minimum, shall we?
Originally posted by Zahlanzi he didn't say that yet. he simply posted some rules he got from a site. let's discuss those and try to keep the ad hominems to a minimum, shall we?
Well this is about the 4th time Mr Raj has posted this list and for 3 of those times we've answered and clearly explained what the correct explinations are and some are just out there in left field. But with him there is absolutly no reasoning with him. You might as well talk to a brick.
Originally posted by galveston75 Well this is about the 4th time Mr Raj has posted this list and for 3 of those times we've answered and clearly explained what the correct explinations are and some are just out there in left field. But with him there is absolutly no reasoning with him. You might as well talk to a brick.
21 Sep '10 08:50
YouTube&ob=av2n
Where did Christ state or imply these ...
Back to Top