@eladar saidI don't think the Gospel of Thomas discredits the Bible. The Bible is what it is, it was compiled in a certain way, and it serves a purpose. I personally don't believe the claims that Christians make about the content of the Bible but my lack of belief does not "discredit" it.
As I said your only interest is to discredit the Bible.
@fmf saidWhat I was trying to say is that it fits with your belief that the Bible is a discredited book.
I don't think the Gospel of Thomas discredits the Bible. The Bible is what it is, it was compiled in a certain way, and it serves a purpose. I personally don't believe the claims that Christians make about the content of the Bible but my lack of belief does not "discredit" it.
@eladar saidYou don't want to discuss the GoT? It's provenance, or historical significance, or possible implications? You just want people to say whether they like it?
Wow changing the subject.
To andwer your quedtion no the Bible is beyond your attempt to discredit.
I find it interesting. You say it's trash.
Ok, next topic.
@moonbus saidNo I do not. I just want to know what it means to you. Why do you like it. Do you view it as further evidence that the Bible is a discredited religious text?
You don't want to discuss the GoT? It's provenance, or historical significance, or possible implications? You just want people to say whether they like it?
I find it interesting. You say it's trash.
Ok, next topic.
I asked you if you believe in forcing your views on the Gospel of Thomas on others.
@fmf saidHarrassing, belittling and being ganged up upon by the dominant group of people active on the board are all methods of trying to force others to conform.
How can people on an internet message board "force" their views on each other?
I have seen this done many times on many sites. You are one of the worst I have seen.
@eladar saidDon't be silly. People share their opinions, perspectives and experiences on a message board like this. That's what it's for. Dissent, disagreement and debate are par for the course. People on the internet can't "force" their views on each other? If I think ~ for example ~ there is nothing immoral about homosexuality, in and of itself, and you think it's immoral, there is no way I can "force" you to think there is nothing immoral about homosexuality.
Harrassing, belittling and being ganged up upon by the dominant group of people active on the board are all methods of trying to force others to conform.
I have seen this done many times on many sites. You are one of the worst I have seen.
@fmf saidWell I have no interest in your opinions unless I asked for them and then only specifically for that question.
Don't be silly. People share their opinions, perspectives and experiences on a message board like this. That's what it's for. Dissent, disagreement and debate are par for the course. People on the internet can't "force" their views on each other? If I think ~ for example ~ there is nothing immoral about homosexuality, in and of itself, and you think it's immoral, there is no way I can "force" you to think there is nothing immoral about homosexuality.
@eladar saidTo me, the extent of your interest in my opinions is neither here nor there ~ all comments here are made in public and for whoever wants to read them. Which, in this specific way, makes our outlook the same.
Well I have no interest in your opinions unless I asked for them and then only specifically for that question.
@fmf saidAbusers rarely believe they are being abusive. It is all point of view.
To me, the extent of your interest in my opinions is neither here nor there ~ all comments here are made in public and for whoever wants to read them. Which, in this specific way, makes our outlook the same.
@eladar saidIt provides me an alternative context for some already well-known sayings attributed to Jesus.
No I do not. I just want to know what it means to you. Why do you like it. Do you view it as further evidence that the Bible is a discredited religious text?
I asked you if you believe in forcing your views on the Gospel of Thomas on others.
No, I do not view it as "further evidence that the Bible is a discredited religious text."
@moonbus saidThat makes sense for a non christian, making no distinction between the validity of the sources.
It provides me an alternative context for some already well-known sayings attributed to Jesus.
No, I do not view it as "further evidence that the Bible is a discredited religious text."