Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat contemporary evidence is there of Jesus?
pathetic, there is more historical evidence for the existence of Christ than for Alexander the Great, we never hear you piping up about whether Alexander existed! shameful historical bias, conjecture and speculation masquerading as fact. Through him to the lions!
Did he exist? Probably but not definitely - his baptism and execution are
possibly documented but not much more.
Even the existence of Nazareth is disputed by some.
I think the evidence for Alex is stronger!
Originally posted by wolfgang59see jay's post, lecture is actually quite wonderful
What contemporary evidence is there of Jesus?
Did he exist? Probably but not definitely - his baptism and execution are
possibly documented but not much more.
Even the existence of Nazareth is disputed by some.
I think the evidence for Alex is stronger!
Originally posted by sonshipIf you have something to say ; say it! (succinctly!)
For anyone wanting to hear good lecture on a
non-sacred,
non-spiritual,
evidencial,
historical analysis of New Testament document testimony on Christ's resurrection, I recommend:
[b]"The Resurrection Argument That Changed a Generation of Scholars"
Dr. Gary Habermas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay_Db4RwZ_M[/b]
Otherwise do not direct us to ridiculous youtube vids
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by sonshipwhat did god do differently when making jesus to ensure he didnt get another adam on his hands?
Jesus Christ is what God meant by the human race.
Jesus Christ is the standard of the Normal of what man should be.
The teaching of Jesus Christ is simply what He Himself lived.
No man on the face of the earth ever preached what he practiced and practiced what he preached to the same level as Jesus Christ.
He lived for 29 years creating no pa ...[text shortened]... infinite with the finite, the incorporation of the Eternal Life with the created life - Godman.
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieHe did nothing different this is the entire point, Christ proved through his perfect obedience that it was not only possible for Adam to have maintained his integrity while under test, but that it was right that he should have done so. I suspect that God trusted his only begotten son, after all they had spent eons together prior to Christ becoming a human.
what did god do differently when making jesus to ensure he didnt get another adam on his hands?
2 edits
Originally posted by wolfgang59Great Video folks -
If you have something to say ; say it! (succinctly!)
Otherwise do not direct us to ridiculous youtube vids
"The Resurrection Argument That Changed a Generation of Scholars"
Dr. Gary Habermas
and to the wolfgangs59s of this forum, I said it.
And I'll direct readers to whatever I wish to direct them to.
If you don't like that, that's too bad.
When I am in the mood to one on one argue with the silly likes of you, I'll do that too.