07 Jan '07 22:00>
if a man is high on drugs and has no idea who he is and what he is doing and then kills a man for no reason whatsoever who's to blame? is it the man, the drugs, the drug seller, the inventor of the drug... god..?
Originally posted by rooktakesqueenThe man ... he decided to use drugs and must face the consequences of his own behavior or actions. Nobody made him take drugs.
if a man is high on drugs and has no idea who he is and what he is doing and then kills a man for no reason whatsoever who's to blame? is it the man, the drugs, the drug seller, the inventor of the drug... god..?
Originally posted by rooktakesqueenThe man is guilty of murder. The seller is guilty of selling illegal drugs.
if a man is high on drugs and has no idea who he is and what he is doing and then kills a man for no reason whatsoever who's to blame? is it the man, the drugs, the drug seller, the inventor of the drug... god..?
Originally posted by ivanhoeThe man may or not be guilty under the law, and since it's the law that defines "murder" ,you had better start with Mens rae.
The man is guilty of murder. The seller is guilty of selling illegal drugs.
Besides this, there is a responsibility on the part of society. Society should create a safe environment for all wherein people have no easy access to dangerous drugs.
Originally posted by frogstompI don't agree with a lot of laws in civilized countries ... that doesn't mean that I am not civilized, especially when there is no clear definition of what "civilized" is in the first place ... but that is not up for debate now.
Too bad ,,it's the law in civilized countries.
Originally posted by Sushillit's STILL is tha law, whether you like it or not.
I don't agree with a lot of laws in civilized countries ... that doesn't mean that I am not civilized, especially when there is no clear definition of what "civilized" is in the first place ... but that is not up for debate now.
The law is created to support society ... not the other way around. A bad law is still a bad law.
Originally posted by rooktakesqueenAre you talking about Bush killing Saddam?
if a man is high on drugs and has no idea who he is and what he is doing and then kills a man for no reason whatsoever who's to blame? is it the man, the drugs, the drug seller, the inventor of the drug... god..?
Originally posted by frogstompI have broken many laws in my life ... so what that its a law? Whenever enough people oppose the law the law will be changed ... at least that is how it is supposed to happen ... the law serves men.
it's STILL is tha law, whether you like it or not.
Originally posted by Sushillthe drugs may or may not be illegal.
I have broken many laws in my life ... so what that its a law? Whenever enough people oppose the law the law will be changed ... at least that is how it is supposed to happen ... the law serves men.
The original question of the topic didn't refer to any particular set of laws so I gave my personal opinion: ... he is guilty.