Why

Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

got me beat

The person who posts most frequently is the one most likely to make the closing post.

Originally posted by DeepThought
The person who posts most frequently is the one most likely to make the closing post.

statistically yes, never the less, are you saying this accounts for Hinds thread killing spree? May I offer an alternative hypothesis? He is talking pure one hundred percent unadulterated hyper concentrated pants!

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

My spectacular posts are only a fail to those that don't like what I have to say. Others consider them spectacular successes.

The Near Genius

Originally posted by RJHinds
My spectacular posts are only a fail to those that don't like what I have to say. Others consider them spectacular successes.

There are no 'others'.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
statistically yes, never the less, are you saying this accounts for Hinds thread killing spree? May I offer an alternative hypothesis? He is talking pure one hundred percent unadulterated hyper concentrated pants!

Quantity is often a compromiser of quality.

Originally posted by DeepThought
Quantity is often a compromiser of quality.

yes there are varying degrees of slobbery drool depending on its profusion.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

This would take care of the first issue:

http://bigdogghouse.com/RHP/

and install

RHP 2013 GB Away

Right, hands up everybody who falls into the "Others consider them spectacular successes" category.

Any takers?