Do Creationists argue against natural selection as expounded by Darwin, and further clarified and developed in the century and half since? Or do Creationists continue to rant against the caricature of the theory of evolution first put forth by Samuel Wilberforce?
Originally posted by Wulebgr Do Creationists argue against natural selection as expounded by Darwin, and further clarified and developed in the century and half since? Or do Creationists continue to rant against the caricature of the theory of evolution first put forth by Samuel Wilberforce?
All I know is that I'm sick and tired of some idiot, who's probably only caught a few tidbits from the by-product of a long chain of regurgitated Phillip E. Johnson, fatuously proclaiming, "If you want to believe it you can, but I didn't come from no monkey."
"I am not ashamed to have a monkey for my ancestor; but I would be ashamed to be connected with a man who used great gifts to obscure the truth." -- Thomas Huxley (in reply to Samuel Wilberforce)
Originally posted by Wulebgr Do Creationists argue against natural selection as expounded by Darwin, and further clarified and developed in the century and half since? Or do Creationists continue to rant against the caricature of the theory of evolution first put forth by Samuel Wilberforce?