1 edit
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkFor a scheme that involved torturing billions of people in angry revenge for not believing or not being able to believe? A: Something unequivocal and concrete, obviously, otherwise it just sounds like a daft invention of the human imagination.
What in your mind constitutes 'actual evidence'?
Originally posted by FMFWhere exactly does the Bible say this will happen for not being able to believe? Aren't you the one assuming that people are not able to believe?
For a scheme that involved torturing billions of people in angry revenge for not believing or not being able to believe? A: Something unequivocal and concrete, obviously, otherwise it just sounds like a daft invention of the human imagination.
If God were to exist, should he allow Adolf Eichmann into Heaven?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI am talking about the fate of non-believers as stated by Christians here who at least have the guts to say what they believe about eternal torture and who they believe will experience that eternal torture. You on the other hand have chickened out of stating what you think happens to them. So I am lumping you in with the believers in the torturer God who believe that non-believers will be tortured for eternity. If you have the guts to unequivocally state what you think happens to them, it will then be possible to see if you are one of them or not one of them.
Where exactly does the Bible say this will happen for [b] not being able to believe? Aren't you the one assuming that people are not able to believe?
If God were to exist, should he allow Adolf Eichmann into Heaven?[/b]
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkI think there may well be a God and I also think we all die and get buried in the ground. Adolf Eichmann was caught and punished, so justice was served. I'd rather he'd died in goal than been executed. But those who loved and survived his victims saw him punished, at least.
If God were to exist, should he allow Adolf Eichmann into Heaven?
Originally posted by FMFI remember exactly what was said on the other thread. On this thread you claimed that you believed something and then "doubt started to creep in". So all I asked was for you to give me one concrete example of something that you started doubting without ever having made a decision that it is no longer believable. You said no. So I have every right to believe that you can't give me one such example.
No, it's not that. As you well know, we had exactly this conversation on another recent thread. And you're simply pretending not to remember it.
Originally posted by FMFI can't know for sure that people will be tortured in hell for all eternity. What I do know is that I sure as hell don't want to find out.
I am talking about the fate of non-believers as stated by Christians here who at least have the guts to say what they believe about eternal torture and who they believe will experience that eternal torture. You on the other hand have chickened out of stating what you think happens to them. So I am lumping you in with the believers in the torturer God who believe ...[text shortened]... hink happens to them, it will then be possible to see if you are one of them or not one of them.
Originally posted by FMFIf you think there may well be a God based purely on a gut feeling, why do you judge people who think there is a God based on what the Bible says, if you can't know for sure that God hasn't revealed himself to anyone?
I think there may well be a God and I also think we all die and get buried in the ground. Adolf Eichmann was caught and punished, so justice was served. I'd rather he'd died in goal than been executed. But those who loved and survived his victims saw him punished, at least.
On what do you base the belief that God has not revealed himself to anyone? Also a gut feeling? What if your gut feeling is wrong?
If justice is anything more than a human made illusion, then no human being can satisfy justice for what Eichman has done.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkHow can it possibly be a deterrent for non-believers? And if it isn't a deterrent, then what on earth is the purpose of such depraved and senseless violence?
I can't know for sure that people will be tortured in hell for all eternity. What I do know is that I sure as hell don't want to find out.
Originally posted by FMFWhen you say that an act is 'depraved and senseless violence' you are proposing such an act to be 'evil'. When you say there is evil, aren’t you admitting there is good? When you accept the existence of goodness, you must affirm a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But when you admit to a moral law, you must posit a moral lawgiver. If God exists, he will be that lawgiver. So essentially your argument is self defeating.
How can it possibly be a deterrent for non-believers? And if it isn't a deterrent, then what on earth is the purpose of such depraved and senseless violence?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkEternal torture is a figment of human imagination. Not recognizing it as being the most evil notion ever dreamt up by humans suggests to me that subscribers to it cannot have a credible moral compass. Fortunately, it's not real. So it's all rather-angels-dancing on-the-head of a pin-esque.
When you say that an act is 'depraved and senseless violence' you are proposing such an act to be 'evil'. When you say there is evil, aren’t you admitting there is good? When you accept the existence of goodness, you must affirm a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But when you admit to a moral law, you must posit a m ...[text shortened]... wgiver. If God exists, he will be that lawgiver. So essentially your argument is self defeating.