Go back
‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

Spirituality

1 edit


-Removed-
If you are asking serious questions and have abandoned your trolling I see no reason for him to ignore your posts.


Originally posted by @dj2becker to divegeester
If you are asking serious questions and have abandoned your trolling I see no reason for him to ignore your posts.
Aside from divegeester, do you think Romans1009 has been trolling as well, especially on the Evidence Please thread?


Originally posted by @fmf
Aside from divegeester, do you think Romans1009 has been trolling as well, especially on the Evidence Please thread?
Give me some examples of Romans trolling and I will tell you whether or not I agree.

Do you think Divegeester has been trolling at all? Yes or No?


Originally posted by @dj2becker
Do you think Divegeester has been trolling at all? Yes or No?
Not really, no. Do you think Romans1009 has been trolling or is it only divegeester?


Originally posted by @fmf
Not really, no. Do you think Romans1009 has been trolling or is it only divegeester?
Not really no.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
Not really no.
Do you think divegeester is trolling?


Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think divegeester is trolling?
I think you are smart enough to work the answer to that out based upon what I have said before.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
I think you are smart enough to work the answer to that out based upon what I have said before.
I haven't accused divegeester of trolling and I haven't accused Romans1009 of trolling. I am consistent. If you don't think Romans1009 is trolling, why do you see divegeester as trolling? Are you reading the things that they are saying to each other? You don't seem consistent.


Originally posted by @fmf
I haven't accused divegeester of trolling and I haven't accused Romans1009 of trolling. I am consistent. If you don't think Romans1009 is trolling, why do you see divegeester as trolling? Are you reading the things that they are saying to each other? You don't seem consistent.
When it comes to divegeester for some reason I don't think you can be objective. Maybe it is because you are mates and have spent time drinking together. I think continually insisting that someone is being dishonest without proof amounts to trolling. You are free to disagree.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
When it comes to divegeester for some reason I don't think you can be objective. Maybe it is because you are mates and have spent time drinking together. I think continually insisting that someone is being dishonest without proof amounts to trolling. You are free to disagree.
Do you think you are "objective" about Romans1009 "objective" about divegeester?

1 edit

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think you are "objective" about Romans1009 "objective" about divegeester?
Probably more than you since I have never met any of them in real life or shared any drinks with them on a regular basis.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
When it comes to divegeester for some reason I don't think you can be objective.
Do you think you can be "objective" about divegeester after all the run-ins you have had with him?


Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think you can be "objective" about divegeester after all the run-ins you have had with him?
As I said probably more objective that you can be since I don't know him at a personal level and I'm not best buddies with him and haven't spent an awful amount of time consuming alcoholic beverages in his company like you supposedly have.


I think it's time for me to stop. I think I am giving dj2becjer exactly the kind of attention he craves.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.