04 Oct '10 14:34>
Originally posted by trev33You should have noted the date that those predictions were made...october 2009!
nice picking chump. Thread 121182
stick to the hockey halfwit.
Originally posted by uzlessya, but you didn't make your picks on the strength of the teams, purely on their financial capabilities and history of making the playoffs. a dangerous game.
You should have noted the date that those predictions were made...october 2009!
Free agency hadn't even begun ffs. I was correct on the yankees and phillies though.
Boston would have got in had they not had all those crazy injuries and who would have honestly thought LAA would lose so many players and not replace them and easily take that weak ass di ...[text shortened]... : tigers
nl east: phillies
nl central: cards
nl west: rockies
nl wildcard: ... padres
Originally posted by trev33never did claim all the time...i said most of the time. a completely disproportionate amount of times.
ya, but you didn't make your picks on the strength of the teams, purely on their financial capabilities and history of making the playoffs. a dangerous game.
my picks could've been worse, padres just missed out on the wildcard on the final day and i don't know what happened the rockies halfway through the season. but i wasn't claiming that the same old te ...[text shortened]... against the mlb's richest clubs a rest, money clearly doesn't mean success all the time.