Dodgers Favored

Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks
I would say that a 'mental giant' is not a clearly defined individual.

One could argue that such a person has a huge memory, and is thus likely to be a very able speller.

Wouldn't you agree?

Mental giant is an intelligent person.

Clearly tweedle dee and teedle dum in this forum were simply physical rejects who took asylum in the geek areas. They excelled at nothing but at least with the nerds they didn't get beat up.

Originally posted by @eladar
Mental giant is an intelligent person.

Clearly tweedle dee and teedle dum in this forum were simply physical rejects who took asylum in the geek areas. They excelled at nothing but at least with the nerds they didn't get beat up.

I think that is your own definition.

See lots of adds to the previous posts. How can you make a statement about my participation/ability in sports, when you have absolutely no idea of either?

Originally posted by @eladar
Mental giant is an intelligent person.

Clearly tweedle dee and teedle dum in this forum were simply physical rejects who took asylum in the geek areas. They excelled at nothing but at least with the nerds they didn't get beat up.

Are you talking about yourself and buzz?
Remember and wash your sheets clan meeting tonight?
I have played more sport in a weekend than you probably have in your sad wannabe librarian Life.
USA humped 58-12 hahaha

Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks
I think that is your own definition.

See lots of adds to the previous posts. How can you make a statement about my participation/ability in sports, when you have absolutely no idea of either?

Assumption based on your lack of actually talking about sports.

It is quite common around here. Nerdy side tracks abound.

Yes, and this is one kept alive by you, waffling on about good spelling not equalling intelligence ad nauseum

My main recent contribution on this forum was in the 'USA out of World Cup' thread, in which I demonstrated that the 1998 defeat of the USA football team by Iran would not have been met with total bewilderment about USA having a football team by the 'average American'

Seems fairly sports based to me

Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks
Yes, and this is one kept alive by you, waffling on about good spelling not equalling intelligence ad nauseum

My main recent contribution on this forum was in the 'USA out of World Cup' thread, in which I demonstrated that the 1998 defeat of the USA football team by Iran would not have been met with total bewilderment about USA having a football team by the 'average American'

Seems fairly sports based to me

What has been your contribution toward my discussions in this forum?

ah, so that is a tacit admission that your previous declaration was incorrect.

generally on here, debating the merits of good spelling

between me and you. So if it applies to me.... (oh yes, and correcting you on the focus of this thread)

Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks
ah, so that is a tacit admission that your previous declaration was incorrect.

generally on here, debating the merits of good spelling

between me and you. So if it applies to me.... (oh yes, and correcting you on the focus of this thread)

Not at all.

Am it assumed that my point of view is based on every post ever made in this forum or simply the threads I have read?

Guessing you mean 'Is it' rather than 'Am it'?

You know about the USA football team ones, you made enough contributions to the thread.

You remember, with the Buzz guy?

Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks
Guessing you mean 'Is it' rather than 'Am it'?

You know about the USA football team ones, you made enough contributions to the thread.

You remember, with the Buzz guy?

Yep, changed what I was thinking as I was typing I think.

Am I supposed to base my opinion to Is it assumed.

I actually do that quite a bit, rewording sentences as I type.

Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks
Guessing you mean 'Is it' rather than 'Am it'?

You know about the USA football team ones, you made enough contributions to the thread.

You remember, with the Buzz guy?

I know enough about how most Americans view soccer.

Originally posted by @eladar
I know enough about how most Americans view soccer.

Wonder why Fox Sports paid $425m to acquire the rights to the World Cup Final (stupidly before Trinidad & Tobago kicked their asses) if no-one over there watches it.

Sour grapes my friend. A very bitter pill to swallow.

Go you champion Aussies !!!!

Originally posted by @eladar
Mental giant is an intelligent person.

Clearly tweedle dee and teedle dum in this forum were simply physical rejects who took asylum in the geek areas. They excelled at nothing but at least with the nerds they didn't get beat up.

Ohhhh common dude !! That's not right. I'm an exception beer pong player and throw a mean curling stone. I have talent in darts, bocce, and have a high level of talent in planking. I'm going to nominate myself as sportsman of the year.......well over in America, not here. Wouldn't have a chance here.

Originally posted by @eladar
I know enough about how most Americans view soccer.

You know every American all 250 million people personally?

And have asked them all what they think?

You are an ass

Originally posted by @radioactive69
Wonder why Fox Sports paid $425m to acquire the rights to the World Cup Final (stupidly before Trinidad & Tobago kicked their asses) if no-one over there watches it.

Sour grapes my friend. A very bitter pill to swallow.

Go you champion Aussies !!!!

ABC paid over one billion dollars for its rights to televise Monday Night Football. That means only one game a week and only during the regular season.