09 Jan '07 18:47>
Originally posted by CliffLandinSimple-minded answers for simple-minded viewers.
Will you ever admit that a Big 10 team was simply beaten, not because they "played bad", but because the other team played better? Your parents need to teach you to admit when you are wrong.
You were dead wrong about Michigan and you were dead wrong about OSU - should we go back and get your quotes?
Just admit it.
They were both out played and out coached.
Americans hate complex questions and utterly detest complex answers. More than two choices is too many! Coke or Pepsi? McDonalds or Burger King? Democrat or Republican? Iraq War: right or wrong?
Everything has to be black and white and the media completely panders to that desire.
Simple-minded answers to simple-minded questions: 1. Florida was so much better than OSU, OSU just didn't belong on the same field. 2. The SEC is just a much better conference than the Big Ten. OSU and Michigan were the best teams in a weak conference. Florida was the best team in a great conference.
(Totally ignoring the fact that Auburn beat Florida but lost to Arkansas who lost to Wisconsin who lost to OSU.)
The complex answer to what happened involves a plethora or factors some emotional, some coaching, some extrinisic, some involving the quality of players.
Big bowl games, both in college and the pros, are often over before they get started. Why is this?
One factor involves team psychology: Teams get beaten in their head long before they get beaten on the field. Why did Tressel go for it on 4th down on the Florida 29 yard line in the second quarter? Because he wanted "to show his team he still believed in them" They were only down 10, but the team psyche was already crumbling. Tressel saw it and reacted drastically, some would say foolishly.
Another factor that played into the Michigan and OSU losses was extrinsic.
The teams were out of their element. Warm weather and TV change the nature of the game. Play those same games in the cold without TV timeouts and you might get a completely different result.
TV slows the game. A running game depends on wearing down the other team. Run play after play after play and the other team's defense gets tired. Give that team a 2-3 minute commerical break every couple of plays and it changes the tempo of the game.
That same tempo favors passing teams. Much easier to move players in and out, change formations, and set up more complicated plays with those regular breaks.
Warm weather also favors passing at the expense of the running game.
Other things to consider:
The longer break for OSU and Mich.
USC's home field advantage.
Heisman distraction.
The psychological damage that Michigan's loss played on OSU.
Over-confidence.
Fear.
Of course, you can also reject all of these thoughts, call me some names, announce that the SEC is an inherently better conference and that the pre-bowl, season long, rankings were nothing but an east coast conspiracy to favor the Big Ten; and then go back to debating more serious issues like which Lite beer tastes better: Bud or Miller.