31 Jul '09 11:49>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/8178248.stm
Adrian Mutu must pay Chelsea £14.65m after losing his appeal against a Fifa ruling for a breach of contract.
The striker, who cost the Blues £15m in 2003, was sacked a year later after he tested positive for cocaine and given a seven-month worldwide football ban.
So, guys, what do you think?
If a club disburses lots of cash for a player, and then the player gets himself banned for doing drugs, then it causes damage to the club and hence it has to pay for it.
I really think it's a good message for players to walk straight. Even if this is in benefit of the clubs, I am happy for the kids, because the young chaps admire those lucky, lucky guys who are called "professional footbal players".
Adrian Mutu must pay Chelsea £14.65m after losing his appeal against a Fifa ruling for a breach of contract.
The striker, who cost the Blues £15m in 2003, was sacked a year later after he tested positive for cocaine and given a seven-month worldwide football ban.
So, guys, what do you think?
If a club disburses lots of cash for a player, and then the player gets himself banned for doing drugs, then it causes damage to the club and hence it has to pay for it.
I really think it's a good message for players to walk straight. Even if this is in benefit of the clubs, I am happy for the kids, because the young chaps admire those lucky, lucky guys who are called "professional footbal players".