Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Sports Forum

Sports Forum

  1. 25 Aug '08 15:12
    when you factor-in the population of the countries ?
    ie -gold medals / head of population.

    surely thats the true decider
  2. Standard member Palynka
    Upward Spiral
    25 Aug '08 15:44
    Originally posted by eamon o
    when you factor-in the population of the countries ?
    ie -gold medals / head of population.

    surely thats the true decider
    I like that ranking.

    Portugal >>>> China.

  3. 26 Aug '08 07:22
    Originally posted by eamon o
    when you factor-in the population of the countries ?
    ie -gold medals / head of population.

    surely thats the true decider
    Why don't you do it yourself?
  4. Standard member uzless
    The So Fist
    26 Aug '08 17:25
    Originally posted by eamon o
    when you factor-in the population of the countries ?
    ie -gold medals / head of population.

    surely thats the true decider
    by that logic, a population of 2 people that won 1 gold is the winning country? Uh...no.


    That means that certain countries with big populations can never win if countries with tiny populations get even just a few medals.
  5. Standard member uzless
    The So Fist
    26 Aug '08 17:26 / 1 edit
    Best way is to give points per medal

    10 points for gold
    5 points for silver
    2 point for bronze


    Then total the score.
  6. 27 Aug '08 08:24
    Originally posted by eamon o
    when you factor-in the population of the countries ?
    ie -gold medals / head of population.

    surely thats the true decider
    Jamaica, I'd think.

    Richard
  7. Standard member forkedknight
    Defend the Universe
    28 Aug '08 17:12
    What about weighting the team sports vs individual? Is the Gymnastics team gold worth the same as the Pommelhorse gold? I don't think so.
  8. Subscriber shortcircuit
    The Energizer
    28 Aug '08 22:54
    Originally posted by forkedknight
    What about weighting the team sports vs individual? Is the Gymnastics team gold worth the same as the Pommelhorse gold? I don't think so.
    Why wouldn't they be equal? There is only one gold medal awarded in each. However, the single events do present the opportunity for the same country to score 3 medals, whereas the team competitions only allow for one medal.
  9. 30 Aug '08 06:00
    I think it should climax in a penalty shoot out ,like they do in proper sport
  10. 01 Sep '08 10:40
    Originally posted by uzless
    by that logic, a population of 2 people that won 1 gold is the winning country? Uh...no.


    That means that certain countries with big populations can never win if countries with tiny populations get even just a few medals.
    The number of golds is what the table should be based on. Although, it's fair enough for countries to compare the total number of medals won too. But in those tables there'll only ever be two winners - China (with the heighest population) and the US (3rd heighest population?).

    However, calculating the medals/golds won per head of the population is perfectly reasonable for the other countries to gauge how they're performing against each other.
  11. Standard member uzless
    The So Fist
    02 Sep '08 19:13
    Originally posted by forkedknight
    What about weighting the team sports vs individual? Is the Gymnastics team gold worth the same as the Pommelhorse gold? I don't think so.
    are any of those events even worth a gold medal?