Originally posted by kw72ukI don't know if cricket is a good sport or not. Please tell me all about it.
You could start a thread entitled "I don't like cricket" if you like.
This thread is about the Ashes. Please don't fill it with off topic posts about whether cricket is a good sport or not.
Thanks. 🙂
Originally posted by AThousandYoungThe Rules of Cricket
I don't know if cricket is a good sport or not. Please tell me all about it.
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in.
Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out.
When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out.
Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in.
There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out.
When both sides have been in and all the men have out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game!
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeSounds very 😴
The Rules of Cricket
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in.
Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out.
When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out.
Sometimes you get men st ...[text shortened]... ter all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game!
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeA sign of getting old here. I will be rising at 5am this time and doing my accounts whilst listening to the final session on Test Match Special.
Late nights and early mornings await....
Previously, I would always stay up late for aussie tests, but this time I will going to bed after the BBC higlights package.
Originally posted by VargAh I remember reading something about that the other day. Sometime in the 1800's was it ?
The first international cricket match ever was between the United States and Canada, so it's not like you Yanks have never heard of cricket!
I have also been looking for an old cricket saying that goes something like
"When you are in you are out..... " anyone got any links to it. Google cant find anything.
Ta,
Dan
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeIf we had our full bowling attack: Hoggard, Harmison, Flintoff, Jones - I would pick Giles for the added batting.
Giles or Panesar?
We do need to get 20 wickets each test. But then who do the English want coming in to bat if we're 250-6?
I reckon Giles will get this match, but will be pretty ineffective, so Panesar will get the nod next test.
Without Jones I would pick Panesar to strengthen the bowling.
Simple.
Although I really like Anderson as a bowler, he needs to do Jones' job as well.
Originally posted by Ian68Well now I've been proven right can we have Fletcher's head on a plate please?
You know that and I know that but we don't pick the team.
I read somewhere that Fletcher wanted to play Flintoff as one of four bowlers but doesn't think he is fit enough for that yet, so he will have to only play 5 batsmen leaving the batting weak. And you know when Fletcher starts talking about the batting being weak he's going to play Giles instead of a real bowler.
😠😠😠😠😠ðŸ˜