24 Apr '13 10:52>
There's been some fearful thread drift here Thread 152567 so I will post this message here and perhaps any further discussion of T20 cricket can happen here, assuming there is any!
Originally posted by thaughbaerI did check it out. My daily e-mail from espncricinfo.com had as its subject "Gayle 175* (66b), RCB win by 130" so I clicked on it and had a look at the scorecard.
153 off 53 with 5 overs still to go... I don't care what anyone says.. that's special.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Royal challengers Bangalore post one of the greatest scores in T20 history and you prefer baseball, could not bring yourself to check it out lest you find it entertaining...
Originally posted by FMFhere is a link to some Bhangra lessons,
I did check it out. My daily e-mail from espncricinfo.com had as its subject "Gayle 175* (66b), RCB win by 130" so I clicked on it and had a look at the scorecard.
Gayle did indeed score an unbeaten 175 runs off only 66 balls.
I took a look at the bowlers he faced. India's [b]Bhuvneshwar Kumar and England's Luke Wright sent down 4 overs ...[text shortened]... 13 fours.
Can anyone seriously claim that these runs Gayle scored are "special"?[/b]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHere's another statistical perspective on the bowling attack that Gayle faced when he made 175 n.o.
here is a link to some Bhangra lessons
Originally posted by thaughbaerAlways interested to hear Vaughan's opinions. I don't always agree with them.
Michael Vaughan ? His opinion mean anything to you ?
Originally posted by FMFRealistically ? A lot. PWI are second bottom in the table. He went after the weaker bowlers but that's not a surprising tactic. It's part of the IPLs remit to blood young Indian talent. But I don't think that takes away from the fact it was an extraordinary spectacle. Just as previously I thought AB de Villiers taking on Dale Steyn was an extraordinary spectacle. I'll stand by my assessment of "special" even with the sarcasm. Dilshan agrees and he was closest ( yes I realise he's biased ).
Always interested to hear Vaughan's opinions. I don't always agree with them.
I haven't heard what he's said about this game. Was his estimation of Pandey, Dinda, Marsh, Murtaza and Finch similar to mine?
What impact do you think the extraordinary mismatch between the bowling attack and the top order batting has on how "special" this innings is - realistically speaking - in cricketing terms?
Originally posted by thaughbaerI don't think its special at all in the broader cricket context. I feel a bit sad that there is a segment of cricket fans that think a batsman with 242 ODIs and 97 tests, smashing 12 overs sent down by five cricketing nobodies, some with severely limited experience of professional cricket, to all parts of the ground [you call it "blood[ing] young Indian talent"?], is something significant or meaningful, statistically or as a genuine sporting contest.
I'll stand by my assessment of "special" even with the sarcasm.
Originally posted by FMFOne of the rules is:
I don't think its special at all in the broader cricket context. I feel a bit sad that there is a segment of cricket fans that think a batsman with 242 ODIs and 97 tests, smashing 12 overs sent down by five cricketing nobodies, some with severely limited experience of professional cricket, to all parts of the ground [you call it "blood[ing] young Indian talent"? ...[text shortened]... because i don't want to be seen to be using it myself to describe a mismatch like this. 😀
Originally posted by Crowleyyes we had another awesome game, last over finish Mumbai Indians needing ten from the last over, what a game, Narine was awesome for KKR he bowled a sublime ball to Tendulkar and took 3 for 13, and yet we are told that playing in only his second test last year, he picked up five wickets, one wonders how many he might have got had he played more so called first class cricket, either that or FMF's theory is pure bunkum and rather than T20 having a negative effect on a players ability, its the opposite, playing test cricket makes them wussies.
Don't worry about the grinch here.
Sure, this wasn't against the 2 best bowling attacks of all time: The Windies of the 80's or the current South African Test squad, but hitting the ball that far, that many times IS special.
T20 cricket is fun. Gayle supplied a great exhibition. That is all.
Originally posted by FMFVirat Kohli thought it was special,
I don't think its special at all in the broader cricket context. I feel a bit sad that there is a segment of cricket fans that think a batsman with 242 ODIs and 97 tests, smashing 12 overs sent down by five cricketing nobodies, some with severely limited experience of professional cricket, to all parts of the ground [you call it "blood[ing] young Indian talent"? ...[text shortened]... because i don't want to be seen to be using it myself to describe a mismatch like this. 😀
Originally posted by robbie carrobieTeam mates patting each other on the back? Whatever next? 😀
Virat Kohli thought it was special,
"I'm privileged that I watched it here live," said Virat Kohli, captain of Gayle's Royal Challengers Bangalore side. "All the people who came to the stadium today should feel honoured that they got to see one of the best innings ever."
BBC