Originally posted by PalynkaTake a look at see for yourself or just be a Rignorant moron. I don't care.
More parochialism from the usual suspect.
http://web.mlsnet.com/media/player/mp_tpl.jsp?w=mms%3A//a1503.v115042.c11504.g.vm.akamaistream.net/7/1503/11504/v0001/mlbmls.download.akamai.com/11504/2007/open/topplays/11/110807_chfner_twellman_goal_350.wmv&w_id=14941&catCode=top_plays&type=v_free&_mp=%20%201
Originally posted by Virtue76Yes Nani's goal against Middlesborough was a cracker ,but i still think Cahills was better,Nani had excellent lead up tro that goal ,and in a previous post i rated that as the best goal this season ,up until Cahills.
Nani has scored a couple this season.
Oh well these things always offer good debate.
We might even see a better one yet.
Originally posted by boarmanIts all about opinions my friend... and bias 😉 I agree though, Cahills was a very good goal.
Yes Nani's goal against Middlesborough was a cracker ,but i still think Cahills was better,Nani had excellent lead up tro that goal ,and in a previous post i rated that as the best goal this season ,up until Cahills.
Oh well these things always offer good debate.
We might even see a better one yet.
Originally posted by EsotericThe type of goal he scored doesn't get better when you consider the opposition. He didn't beat 4 Chelsea defenders with skill, movement and guile - he athletically connected with an overhead kick, the opposition is irrelevant.
It was a good goal but far from goal of the year. Tim Cahill's is better especially when you consider it was against Chelsea not some 3rd rate American team.
As much as I like an overhead kick or a long range strike, all-round team goals are more my thing.