Tournaments Forum

Tournaments Forum

  1. Swansea
    Joined
    03 Jul '02
    Moves
    5679
    27 Nov '02 21:05
    Just a question, if 2 players in any group finish on equal points what
    happens? A play off? Both go through?
    Janey
    A curious Welsh Lass
  2. SubscriberRuss
    RHP Code Monkey
    RHP HQ
    Joined
    21 Feb '01
    Moves
    2031
    28 Nov '02 12:47
    Both go through.

    -Russ
  3. DonationLuck
    TEA PARTY MEMBER
    St Maarten, Neth Ant
    Joined
    21 Jun '02
    Moves
    1045183
    01 Dec '02 02:13
  4. DonationLuck
    TEA PARTY MEMBER
    St Maarten, Neth Ant
    Joined
    21 Jun '02
    Moves
    1045183
    01 Dec '02 04:36
    Just a question, if 2 players in any group finish on equal points what
    happens? A play off? Both go through?
    Janey
    A curious Welsh Lass
    Janey!!!

    Wales is much better than England in FOOTBALL!

    🙂

    Harri / Luck
  5. DonationLuck
    TEA PARTY MEMBER
    St Maarten, Neth Ant
    Joined
    21 Jun '02
    Moves
    1045183
    03 Dec '02 00:56
    Janey,
    Loose, PLZ!!!!!!!!!!!

    Harri / Luck
  6. DonationLuck
    TEA PARTY MEMBER
    St Maarten, Neth Ant
    Joined
    21 Jun '02
    Moves
    1045183
    03 Dec '02 22:42
    I believe the payers with highest points and besides the group winners
    should go to the next round.
    Look at the group winners and their points, anyone with higher or
    equal points than a group winner should go to the next round.

    Sincetely,

    Harri / Luck
  7. Swansea
    Joined
    03 Jul '02
    Moves
    5679
    04 Dec '02 07:29
    I agree with Harri - he deserves to go through,
    he is a tough player and pretty cute too
    Janey
    x
  8. DonationLuck
    TEA PARTY MEMBER
    St Maarten, Neth Ant
    Joined
    21 Jun '02
    Moves
    1045183
    04 Dec '02 13:39
    🙂 🙂😀😉
  9. Joined
    15 Aug '02
    Moves
    34641
    07 Dec '02 09:20
    Originally posted by Luck
    I believe the payers with highest points and besides the group
    winners
    should go to the next round.
    Look at the group winners and their points, anyone with higher or
    equal points than a group winner should go to the next round.

    Sincetely,

    Harri / Luck
    Nice idea in an ordinary world but with Schliemann dropping out it's
    unbalanced that group. This effectively means that the winner of that
    group will have fewer points. I'd like to them (Chris & Russ) to agree
    to your idea because it will give me a chance too but .....

    --J.
  10. Derbyshire, UK
    Joined
    03 Sep '01
    Moves
    10049
    07 Dec '02 12:28
    I agree that it would be nice if some of the lesser rated players could
    progress beyond the first round. So how about we extend the
    tournament by instigating 4 rounds:

    The top two from each group in round 1 go through to Round 2.

    Round 2 has 10 groups of 5, the top two going through to round 3.

    Round 3 has 2 groups of 5, the top two going through to round 4.

    Round 4 has a single group of four players, winner takes all.

    Just a thought,

    Rich
  11. Joined
    04 Nov '02
    Moves
    3684
    07 Dec '02 15:391 edit
    i think we should be strict in allowing only the group winners to
    proceed to the next round. it is the nature of competition that player
    get eliminated, whether in the first round or next. modifying the
    qualification criteria seems too arbitrary.
    respectfully,
    S.

    🙂
    😀
    😞
  12. Joined
    20 Feb '02
    Moves
    58336
    07 Dec '02 16:34
    Originally posted by Kernunos
    I agree that it would be nice if some of the lesser rated players
    could
    progress beyond the first round. So how about we extend the
    tournament by instigating 4 rounds:

    The top two from each group in round 1 go through to Round 2.

    Round 2 has 10 groups of 5, the top two going through to round 3.

    Round 3 has 2 groups of 5, the top two going th ...[text shortened]... d 4.

    Round 4 has a single group of four players, winner takes all.

    Just a thought,

    Rich
    I agree. I think more people will enter the tournaments if they think
    they have a greater chance of staying in it longer. No one like to
    loose, and with the way the groups are set up it is quite obvious who
    should win them. The only things that can throw a spanner in the
    works are timeouts and newer players who do not have a rating level
    to their ability yet.

    This does not need to apply to every tournament, but I am sure we
    could have one where only the bottom player in the group dropped
    out - this gives everyone in the group something to play for and a
    much longer tournament that a lot more people will get enjoyment out
    of. If people do not think that is there cup of team, then they can
    enter a tournament where only the winner of the froup goes through.

    Cheers

    Andrew
  13. Joined
    15 Aug '02
    Moves
    34641
    07 Dec '02 17:10
    Since the 100 to 1 has already started it would seem unreasonbable
    to change rules. However I think Andrew has a good point about more
    people playing and it could be implemented in the New Year tourny.
  14. DonationLuck
    TEA PARTY MEMBER
    St Maarten, Neth Ant
    Joined
    21 Jun '02
    Moves
    1045183
    07 Dec '02 23:44
    As it looks now, it could be for example 29 players going to the next
    round, how do you do the paring? Bets would be to add some more
    players!
    The same way it is in track & field tournaments, the winners and the
    best times goes to the next round! A lot more interesting for the less
    good players like me!!

    Sincerely,

    Harri / Luck
  15. Joined
    15 Aug '02
    Moves
    34641
    08 Dec '02 11:402 edits
Back to Top