Originally posted by RevRSleekerA MONTH after I sent feedback and 3weeks after the post here..I must be nuts as this is as plain a case of site ( admitted ) error that I've come across..
I've posted 'similar' in months gone by but 'tagged' onto other topics etc, but I think it needs pointing out again if only for site statistics on tournament winners. I posted this exact note, however, in the clan public forum recently... but since 'Beatlemania' was erroneously banned in march, and then promptly reinstated, nothing has been done after th ...[text shortened]... othing, we're now into the 6th month after the event. Something should be done !???
Originally posted by KewpieI think I mentioned something about the fact that that tourney would 'right itself' ( and the tourney would be CORRECTLY awarded )..I assumed because it was Easter it would take a 'bit' longer than normal to be re awarded lol..you, of course, said it would NOT right itself and that it was a feedback issue...!
Maybe they'll do something about it if we make enough noise. Surely it can't be all that difficult, since the site owners have agreed that it is plainly wrong, to change the name shown as the tourney winner.
Originally posted by KewpieYes, I did think about 'site ideas'.. however, I dismissed it as one forum appears as unlikely to solve this an another when the site is fully aware they made an error of ways ( I've posted in a few now )...perhaps the above posters suggestion may help, even though I'm not convinced any longer by 'rec' posts, certainly the en masse feedback route is worth a stab...beyond that I'm just left to wonder why should all this be necessary lol....
Where a player is banned for cause after a tourney prize has been awarded, the tourney result still stands. I can understand that the admins don't want to have to re-process every tournament where that happens. But in this case the banning was an administrative error, which has been admitted by Russ, and it should be possible for Russ to amend the name show ...[text shortened]... orum (maybe Site Ideas because we know he reads that one) with a link back to this one.
Originally posted by KewpieOk, maybe we'll overwhelm them by driving them mad with this 'topic'...Site Ideas will be made 'aware' lol..
Just a point: Russ doesn't read all the forums, and probably not this one. Since it's your thread, perhaps you should start a thread in another forum (maybe Site Ideas because we know he reads that one) with a link back to this one.
Originally posted by RevRSleekersix weeks ago, time to renew the harping 😉
Ok, maybe we'll overwhelm them by driving them mad with this 'topic'...Site Ideas will be made 'aware' lol..
Here it is:
We're going to drive them positively POTTY with all the carry on we're creating 😀
Originally posted by PonderableYep, I was trying to come up with some kind of 'SPECIAL ASSAULT' here, something new....still pondering that one...has anyone got any good ideas lol...
six weeks ago, time to renew the harping 😉
Originally posted by RevRSleekerWhat a joke. Between this, and a couple of other issues I have witnessed with the lack of admin concern for the people that are paying them, I think I will look into other sites to give my money to. I just reupped my sub not too long ago, so I will have plenty of time to research and make a good decision. I have been with the site pretty much from the start. This name started in 03, but I had an account in 01. I have witnessed many upgrades to the site. It seems latley that the upgrades are few and far between while other sites have passed them up in almost every aspect. I would hate to leave the site.... call it loyalty, but enough is enough.
'jmskms' most certainly did, he's had no reply to his feedback either. If he was so insistent upon the tourney going 'to the rightful winner', then I'd have thought his input alone would suffice. I've not contacted 'beatlemania' in this regard, perhaps I've made the error of assuming that as it was a simple site error, 'little' input would actually be needed..now into EIGHT months on, I figured all wrong...