Originally posted by cheshirecatstevensIf I was Russ I'd start a tournament for a minimum of 1,000 entrants and leave it open until full.
Glad i paid to have no tournements open. what about more tournements for sud 1200 players? site is not matching promises.
Then start another.
That way there would always be an open tournament as it would take so long to fill up.
Originally posted by adramforallif i was still a subscriber i would rec this post.
If I was Russ I'd start a tournament for a minimum of 1,000 entrants and leave it open until full.
Then start another.
That way there would always be an open tournament as it would take so long to fill up.
(and add that it must be a very sensible construction ... timeout 1 and timebank 14 ... or timeout 0 and timebank 40 ... and groupsize between 6 and 11.)
Originally posted by cheshirecatstevensi think the problem is the tournament size .. i am surprised there are any tournaments at all with less than 100 players.
look more tournies filled in less than the time i move -24hrs-. membership really paying for self now.its hard to join a tournement when they fill that fast. how about a waiting list flag for tournements. like one opens with inn your parameters you get loaded in automaticly?
if i ran this site's tournaments: all tournaments would be 100+ players ... and there would always be open tournies in all bands and as open-fast and open-slow.
Originally posted by flexmoreBeg to differ. The May grouped banded filled very slowly, and only the 1250 to 1349 and under 1250 filled at all. The June grouped banded is similar. Maybe there is an issue with tournament size in those grading bands, or the bands are too wide, but tournament size overall is hardly the issue.
i think the problem is the tournament size .. i am surprised there are any tournaments at all with less than 100 players.