1. SubscriberRuss
    RHP Code Monkey
    RHP HQ
    Joined
    21 Feb '01
    Moves
    2396
    11 Jul '06 13:351 edit
    A new vote has been created to seek feedback on tournament time controls so in the future the majority of tournaments can be targeted more effectively to what people actually want.

    Please take the time to vote - a large sample would be very useful.

    Vote from the community menu >> vote.

    Thanks.

    -Russ
  2. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    11 Jul '06 13:46
    http://www.timeforchess.com/vote/index.php
  3. London
    Joined
    28 Sep '04
    Moves
    110329
    11 Jul '06 14:36
    Originally posted by Russ
    A new vote has been created to seek feedback on tournament time controls so in the future the majority of tournaments can be targeted more effectively to what people actually want.

    Please take the time to vote - a large sample would be very useful.

    Vote from the community menu >> vote.

    Thanks.

    -Russ
    Would there ever be the possibility of being able to choose whatever timeout you like in friendly games, e.g. 2/5 ?
  4. Standard membergambit05
    Mad Murdock
    I forgot
    Joined
    05 May '05
    Moves
    20526
    11 Jul '06 16:03
    1/3 is missing.
  5. Joined
    10 Nov '05
    Moves
    30185
    11 Jul '06 19:48
    Originally posted by gambit05
    1/3 is missing.
    That's because it is too quick.

    IMO 3/7 is too quick.

    3/14 is ideal.
  6. Joined
    31 Dec '02
    Moves
    41956
    11 Jul '06 20:09
    Done!

    Cheers!!
  7. Standard memberbugs bunny
    the one and only
    somewhere your not
    Joined
    05 Apr '03
    Moves
    25491
    13 Jul '06 13:30
    Originally posted by Russ
    A new vote has been created to seek feedback on tournament time controls so in the future the majority of tournaments can be targeted more effectively to what people actually want.

    Please take the time to vote - a large sample would be very useful.

    Vote from the community menu >> vote.

    Thanks.

    -Russ
    How about some options with no time banks?
  8. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    13 Jul '06 13:38
    Originally posted by bugs bunny
    How about some options with no time banks?
    Why would you possibly want no time bank. Personally I like the low timeout/ huge timebank games best. The 1-3 day timeout keeps everything moving and the large timebank allows for a vacation or a couple of deep thinks).
  9. Standard memberbugs bunny
    the one and only
    somewhere your not
    Joined
    05 Apr '03
    Moves
    25491
    13 Jul '06 13:48
    Originally posted by zebano
    Why would you possibly want no time bank. Personally I like the low timeout/ huge timebank games best. The 1-3 day timeout keeps everything moving and the large timebank allows for a vacation or a couple of deep thinks).
    I think the game really keeps moving with out a timebank. I believe there was a time when the site had no timebanks. The games play a little more like OTB games. Gotta keep moving.
  10. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    13 Jul '06 16:16
    Originally posted by Russ
    A new vote has been created to seek feedback on tournament time controls so in the future the majority of tournaments can be targeted more effectively to what people actually want.

    Please take the time to vote - a large sample would be very useful.

    Vote from the community menu >> vote.

    Thanks.

    -Russ
    EXCELLENT!! Vote cast, great stuff!! 😀
  11. Standard memberleisurelysloth
    Man of Steel
    rushing to and fro
    Joined
    13 Aug '05
    Moves
    5930
    13 Jul '06 20:16
    Originally posted by bugs bunny
    How about some options with no time banks?
    Thread 46321

    It pays to pay attention!
  12. Standard memberbugs bunny
    the one and only
    somewhere your not
    Joined
    05 Apr '03
    Moves
    25491
    14 Jul '06 00:56
    Originally posted by leisurelysloth
    Thread 46321

    It pays to pay attention!
    So I should have posted my thoughts in your thread? Sorry. I dont get a chance to read through every thread here. Thought I caught the important one. No timebank would still be my preference even if it means nothing.
  13. Joined
    16 Jul '02
    Moves
    11136
    15 Jul '06 23:38
    Originally posted by Russ
    A new vote has been created to seek feedback on tournament time controls so in the future the majority of tournaments can be targeted more effectively to what people actually want.

    Please take the time to vote - a large sample would be very useful.

    Vote from the community menu >> vote.

    Thanks.

    -Russ
    I wonder whether votes are a good way to decide on this, given the limited sample. Wouldn't the speed at which certain tournaments fill up be a better indication? (Of course, that's assuming people check the time controls before entering a tournament)

    Anyway, I hope this doesn't mean less popular formulas disappear or become too rare.
  14. UK
    Joined
    16 Dec '02
    Moves
    71100
    16 Jul '06 07:26
    Originally posted by DdV
    I wonder whether votes are a good way to decide on this, given the limited sample. Wouldn't the speed at which certain tournaments fill up be a better indication? (Of course, that's assuming people check the time controls before entering a tournament)

    Anyway, I hope this doesn't mean less popular formulas disappear or become too rare.
    Indeed.

    For example, the current long hual duel and tourny are fully subscribed, yet, according to the vote, they should both have the same few people in them.

    By all means increase the number of 3/7s if that's what people want, but it'd be nice to see the longer t/o tournaments stay at least as regular as they are now. Short t/o games are fairly useless to me these days.
  15. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    17 Jul '06 18:07

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree