The Misfits are looking for you

Originally posted by lemondrop
I'm a jolly good fellow
dated any pretty women lately?

Maiden Gertrude,

Please find a dating site if you are looking for dates!! 😛

-VR

Originally posted by lemondrop
my point is that you managed to get a lot of easy points for your clan with your questionable low rating
the reason why your rating was so low
who cares
sandbaggers always have some excuse
it was cheap points no matter the reason

So I'm sure you can explain why it has taken me 9 months now to raise my rating 200 points, and yet Mctayto can manipulate his rating so finely that he can match my rating exactly, and in one-eighth the time.

(Apparently someone didn't like me telling the truth about that and got some low-life mod to remove my post. He's since raised his rating another 31 points so that it doesn't look quite so obvious that he's stalking me.)

Originally posted by Suzianne
So I'm sure you can explain why it has taken me 9 months now to raise my rating 200 points, and yet Mctayto can manipulate his rating so finely that he can match my rating exactly, and in one-eighth the time.

(Apparently someone didn't like me telling the truth about that and got some low-life mod to remove my post. He's since raised his rating another 31 points so that it doesn't look quite so obvious that he's stalking me.)

I'll repeat again
you started your clan play well below your true strength
people like you throw the term sandbagger freely to those they have issues with
it took you 9 months to get back to near your true rating
so what
you are a slow mover and play fewer games
they were still cheap points

Originally posted by lemondrop
I'll repeat again
you started your clan play well below your true strength
people like you throw the term sandbagger freely to those they have issues with
it took you 9 months to get back to near your true rating
so what
you are a slow mover and play fewer games
they were still cheap points

You'd know girlyboy. You've been milking the system for all it's worth since your clanmates found out what a scumbag you were and abandoned you.

Honestly.......you're probably a worse sandbagger than McGayo and just as adept as carrobie at manipulating the system. Now.......back on carrobies knee and keep your trap shut till he pulls your little string.

there you go
casting stones again
I don't think many care what you think anyway
at least not those with decency

Originally posted by lemondrop
there you go
casting stones again
I don't think many care what you think anyway
at least not those with decency

Maiden Gertrude,

You live in a fantasy world with robbie, mctayto, & little v.! You have no idea what people think of all 4 of you. Trust me in a Vote of least liked, it would be a toss up among the four of you.

-VR

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Maiden Gertrude,

You live in a fantasy world with robbie, mctayto, & little v.! You have no idea what people think of all 4 of you. Trust me in a Vote of least liked, it would be a toss up among the four of you.

-VR

you know milky
You float in the same boat with all the other a** holes on this site
I don't care whether I'm liked or not

Originally posted by lemondrop
I'll repeat again
you started your clan play well below your true strength
people like you throw the term sandbagger freely to those they have issues with
it took you 9 months to get back to near your true rating
so what
you are a slow mover and play fewer games
they were still cheap points

From the person who knows all about cheap.

Look at the people you sold out your integrity for.

Now all you got is crying about other people on a chess site.

I'm sure that according to you, Mctayto is some kind of hero.

There's a difference between calling people what they are and being what they are.

Management here could solve 90% of the problem they have with abusers on this site by permanently banning the four of you, but for some reason they keep supporting you maggots. How many people have left because the admins can't find their balls and do what needs to be done? Can you even count that high?

Originally posted by Suzianne
From the person who knows all about cheap.

Look at the people you sold out your integrity for.

Now all you got is crying about other people on a chess site.

I'm sure that according to you, Mctayto is some kind of hero.

There's a difference between calling people what they are and being what they are.

Management here could solve 90% of the pro ...[text shortened]... e the admins can't find their balls and do what needs to be done? Can you even count that high?

Hey waz up Kellyanne 😵

Originally posted by Suzianne
From the person who knows all about cheap.

Look at the people you sold out your integrity for.

Now all you got is crying about other people on a chess site.

I'm sure that according to you, Mctayto is some kind of hero.

There's a difference between calling people what they are and being what they are.

Management here could solve 90% of the pro ...[text shortened]... e the admins can't find their balls and do what needs to be done? Can you even count that high?

I know exactly what you are
from this forum and others on this site
you are a dishonest trouble maker
a violator of privacy and just plain phony

Originally posted by lemondrop
I know exactly what you are
from this forum and others on this site
you are a dishonest trouble maker
a violator of privacy and just plain phony

Oh, that's rich, coming from you. I suppose you and the other malcontents here are angels?

1. dishonest - this is a joke, right?
2. trouble maker - yeah, I've been called this before, but usually by men.
3. a violator of privacy - I can't even fathom the thinking that went into this one
4. just plain phony - I have my faults, and at one time or another, I've owned up to every single one of them, none of which are in this list and I doubt you're even aware of any of them.

"A violator of privacy". I find this one especially rich.

You should go on the road.

No, I meant as a comedian.

Remember, sweetie, you can't stand up for yourself when you're on your knees.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Oh, that's rich, coming from you. I suppose you and the other malcontents here are angels?

1. dishonest - this is a joke, right?
2. trouble maker - yeah, I've been called this before, but usually by men.
3. a violator of privacy - I can't even fathom the thinking that went into this one
4. just plain phony - I have my faults, and at one time or anoth ...[text shortened]... i]comedian[/i].

Remember, sweetie, you can't stand up for yourself when you're on your knees.

please don't call me sweetie
not yet Valentine's day
by violating privacy
was referring to the sending of pm's of a very disturbing nature
you remember, don't you?

Originally posted by lemondrop
please don't call me sweetie
not yet Valentine's day
by violating privacy
was referring to the sending of pm's of a very disturbing nature
you remember, don't you?

In case you have some kind of mental block making you incapable of acknowledging truth, that incident was a direct result of MY privacy being violated. You grabbed that stick by the wrong end, as usual.

Originally posted by Suzianne
In case you have some kind of mental block making you incapable of acknowledging truth, that incident was a direct result of MY privacy being violated. You grabbed that stick by the wrong end, as usual.

what incident was that?
does not the one receiving a pm have a right not to have his privacy invaded?

Originally posted by lemondrop
what incident was that?
does not the one receiving a pm have a right not to have his privacy invaded?

If he didn't want me PMing him, he could block me anytime he wanted. In fact I encouraged him to do exactly that. His privacy was never at issue, dimwit, mine was.