Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I disagree. The Party and the Inquisition were not very different, for instance.
Then I believe you still have the Enlightenment idea of the Inquisition. They didn't
actually burn people alive just because of a single accusation of witchcraft, you know. They were no angels, certainly not, but many of their "victims" were actually... shock, horror... acquitted!
This varied a lot by place and time, of course. The worst were certain years of the Spanish Inquisition - logical, because that was mostly a political body. My own Netherlands are a good example. People were indeed burnt at the stake here, with the excuse that they were impenitent "heretics" (read: Calvinists). The real reason was, of course, our struggle for independence from Spanish tyranny. It was the Alcazar which executed these people - and in the end, it was all in vain, since in 1648 we got what we wanted anyway. That doesn't sound much like Miniluv to me.
Besides, the Party was quite clearly based on, well, the Party. The Soviet "Communist" Party, that is, which Orwell despised for having thrown away everything that Communism should stand for. Orwell himself was a great believer in the ideals behind Communism, wrongly or rightly, but honestly. He hated the Soviet Union for not being honest about it - and at that, in any case, he
was right. One could also argue for influences from the Nazi Party. Both were very much contemporary - the book was published in 1948.
Richard