20 Jan '10 21:59>
Originally posted by MelanerpesFirst of all, Iran does do that in any case.
So if Iran decided to round up a few hundred Americans and declared them to be "enemy combatants" without any sort of trial, should the president just accept that Iran has the right to detain them indefinitely?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/International/story?id=8236485
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/985731.html
Second, of course we would not "accept" Iran doing it, just like they don't "accept" us doing it either.
The question isn't whether the other guy would accept your doing it; the question is whether you're right to do it.
I agree with the concept allowing detained terror suspect some due process rights and to require the government to prove that the detainee was an enemy combatant to some sort of neutral tribunal before keeping them indefinitely (which, apparently, Barack Obama does not, if his actions thus far are any indication). But I sure wouldn't demand full civilian trials for every person captured on the battlefield.