Go back
2000 Mules

2000 Mules

Debates

Clock

The main thrust of the claims made by the film are based on surveillance footage of ballot boxes and analysis of cellphone location data.

I have not seen the film. The official website for the film would not work for me.

https://aws.2000mules.com/

I did find a video on Rumble though.

https://rumble.com/v13v4sv-2000-mules.html

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-2000-mules-film-election-fraud-dsouza-rittenhouse-1703680

The Associated Press said 2,000 Mules uses "flawed" analysis of cellphone location data. True of false?

Clock

@metal-brain said
The main thrust of the claims made by the film are based on surveillance footage of ballot boxes and analysis of cellphone location data.

I have not seen the film. The official website for the film would not work for me.

https://aws.2000mules.com/

I did find a video on Rumble though.

https://rumble.com/v13v4sv-2000-mules.html

https://www.newsweek.com/donal ...[text shortened]... Associated Press said 2,000 Mules uses "flawed" analysis of cellphone location data. True of false?
Look at every other film this filmmaker has made and realize they're all the same. The pushing of the Trump agenda to destroy democracy. Maybe he figures he'll become rich beyond his wildest dreams if only he bends his knee and kisses the ring of King Donald.

It's like if Giuliani and Lindell had a baby.

Clock

@suzianne said
Look at every other film this filmmaker has made and realize they're all the same. The pushing of the Trump agenda to destroy democracy. Maybe he figures he'll become rich beyond his wildest dreams if only he bends his knee and kisses the ring of King Donald.

It's like if Giuliani and Lindell had a baby.
So you have no proof he is lying. We all expected that from you.
You have faith he is lying. Got it.

Clock

@metal-brain said
The main thrust of the claims made by the film are based on surveillance footage of ballot boxes and analysis of cellphone location data.

I have not seen the film. The official website for the film would not work for me.

https://aws.2000mules.com/

I did find a video on Rumble though.

https://rumble.com/v13v4sv-2000-mules.html

https://www.newsweek.com/donal ...[text shortened]... Associated Press said 2,000 Mules uses "flawed" analysis of cellphone location data. True of false?
The first link is not referring to an actual website. It is non-existent (though it is displayed in google search result) this is a strong hint just how serious the thing is...

https://www.amazon.com/000-Mules-Thought-Never-Wrong/dp/168451083X

gives a link to an upcoming book.

So please reserve any comment until anything was out.

Oh and about proof: Please refrain from the fallacy of the follwing argument. A person told another persn who posted it in the comments of an abscure internet palttform that Trump himself stuffed a ballot box.

You can't disprove that? So it has to be true.

Do you realize any pattern?

Clock

@metal-brain said
The main thrust of the claims made by the film are based on surveillance footage of ballot boxes and analysis of cellphone location data.

I have not seen the film. The official website for the film would not work for me.

https://aws.2000mules.com/

I did find a video on Rumble though.

https://rumble.com/v13v4sv-2000-mules.html

https://www.newsweek.com/donal ...[text shortened]... Associated Press said 2,000 Mules uses "flawed" analysis of cellphone location data. True of false?
After having read the Newweek piece:

If Dinesh D'Souza actually is in possesion of court-proof m,aterial on voter fraud, why is he not going to court? That would be the way forward.

So in your words. Can he proove anything? No. So the matter is not worth a debate.

Clock

@ponderable said
The first link is not referring to an actual website. It is non-existent (though it is displayed in google search result) this is a strong hint just how serious the thing is...

https://www.amazon.com/000-Mules-Thought-Never-Wrong/dp/168451083X

gives a link to an upcoming book.

So please reserve any comment until anything was out.

Oh and about proof: Please refr ...[text shortened]... uffed a ballot box.

You can't disprove that? So it has to be true.

Do you realize any pattern?
You don't like to read, do you?
The main thrust of the claims made by the film are based on surveillance footage of ballot boxes and analysis of cellphone location data.

Clock

@ponderable said
After having read the Newweek piece:

If Dinesh D'Souza actually is in possesion of court-proof m,aterial on voter fraud, why is he not going to court? That would be the way forward.

So in your words. Can he proove anything? No. So the matter is not worth a debate.
It does NOT say that in the newsweek article.
Are you making that up?

Clock

@metal-brain said
It does NOT say that in the newsweek article.
Are you making that up?
Classic Russian troll thread, prove the thesis of the stupid film or focus on lying about lizard peoples and the war in Ukraine

Clock

@metal-brain said
So you have no proof he is lying. We all expected that from you.
You have faith he is lying. Got it.
There is plenty of proof. You want, so desperately, to ignore it. Got it.

Clock

@suzianne said
There is plenty of proof. You want, so desperately, to ignore it. Got it.
No, you have faith there is proof somewhere because you don't know of any.
Hearsay is not proof.

Clock

@kevcvs57 said
Classic Russian troll thread, prove the thesis of the stupid film or focus on lying about lizard peoples and the war in Ukraine
Stop lying and being stupid.

Clock

@metal-brain said
Stop lying and being stupid.
60 Federal Court rulings vs a
''.....'mockumentary film....'' previewed on rumble?
Gee, I don't know who to believe.

Clock

@jimm619 said
60 Federal Court rulings vs a
''.....'mockumentary film....'' previewed on rumble?
Gee, I don't know who to believe.
I know it’s a proper head scratcher, especially when our resident reality checker seems to be coming out in support of the claims in the film 🤔

Clock
2 edits

@kevcvs57 said
I know it’s a proper head scratcher, especially when our resident reality checker seems to be coming out in support of the claims in the film 🤔
😆Really, a hard hitting, mockumentary,
previewed on 'rumble,' no less.......
Could it be that the 60 Federal rulings were in error?

Clock

@metal-brain said
The main thrust of the claims made by the film are based on surveillance footage of ballot boxes and analysis of cellphone location data.

I have not seen the film. The official website for the film would not work for me.

https://aws.2000mules.com/

I did find a video on Rumble though.

https://rumble.com/v13v4sv-2000-mules.html

https://www.newsweek.com/donal ...[text shortened]... Associated Press said 2,000 Mules uses "flawed" analysis of cellphone location data. True of false?
Your first link is busted. Take out the leading "aws":

https://2000mules.com/

I've seen the movie. I watched it on BitChute before it was taken down. It's actually playing in about 400 theaters. The movie itself is a bit meh IMO, but the work of True the Vote ( truethevote.org ) seems straightforward and legit, though it needs to be investigated by law enforcement.

The left wing media hit pieces you'll see linked from the lefties here are likely not credible. If you want to see a decent criticism of the film try Ben Shapiro's:

https://rumble.com/v148u5r-ben-shapiro-reacts-to-the-2000-mules-documentary.html

If you want to hear it straight from the TTV folks without D'Souza in the middle try this interview from the Epoch Times (scroll down for video):

https://www.truethevote.org/the-epoch-times-interview-about-who-is-funding-the-ballot-mules/

There's also a good article on geo-location tracking in the NY Times here:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.