His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
@averagejoe1 saidNo. You don’t believe in global warming, so what’s the issue?
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
@shavixmir saidLike I just told you, Shav. the 'issue' is the total silence of the weenie libs including yourself who will NOT say anything negative about our horrible leadership, and rich people with private jets (don't you hate rich people?).
No. You don’t believe in global warming, so what’s the issue?
It matters not what 'I' think about global warming, does it. You too, have Suzianne Syndrome. The 'Czar' floods us with CO2, and you CO2 haters just let it slide on the Forum.
Why is that? Oh, here is a pretty picture of his nice jet.
https://nypost.com/2022/07/19/climate-buster-biden-green-czar-john-kerrys-jet-unleashes-tons-of-co2/
@averagejoe1 saidIt might possibly (no promises) help your case if you had the slightest clue what you were talking about.
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
@averagejoe1 saidGlad to oblige, as you do not seem to see what I am talking about.
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
You lose this one, Suzianne, along with all libs who will not respond to this very honest query. You fellers talk ugly about climate problems, but stop short when this guy who needs a haircut flies around at govt expense. Do you think we have to pay for his flight attendant? You don't think he sits back there by himself, do you?
I am once gain chalking up another win. 😉
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@shavixmir said......''Fools rush in, where wise men fear to tread...''
No. You don’t believe in global warming, so what’s the issue?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@averagejoe1 saidHey Jo,
Glad to oblige, as you do not seem to see what I am talking about.
You lose this one, Suzianne, along with all libs who will not respond to this very honest query. You fellers talk ugly about climate problems, but stop short when this guy who needs a haircut flies around at govt expense. Do you think we have to pay for his flight attendant? You don't think he sits back there by himself, do you?
I am once gain chalking up another win. 😉
seems as if you're always complaining about Suzi,
I wonder why, do you think, more people tend to agree with her,
on virtually every subject, than agree with you? I'm just sayin'.
Interesting, how do you explain this phenomena?
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidwhy do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it?
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
John - Stop it! Will that work for you Joe? 😀
Do you write with Suzianne in concert to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc?
Yes, we do Joe. I told her I'm going out for a smoke, when I get back, she better have the horn and string sections fixed. I can't work this way! 😏
@averagejoe1 said
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
@averagejoe1 saidThis whole narrative is moronic in nature.
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
Hannity is yapping this up almost every day.
I am against filling our atmosphere with carbon.
Yet I sit here waiting to board my flight.
What I am for is that work be done so that I can in future board a flight that pumps out no carbon (or at least much less).
And certainly the next generation will look back at fossil fuels in the same way I look at steam engines today.
If I was very rich, I would probably have a private jet (to reduce my chances of sitting next to someone like you on a flight).
But I would still support that my private jet in future runs on something more environmentally friendly.
For you as a capitalist to play the rich vs poor card is laughable.
1 edit
@mghrn55 saidwith respect, your post says absolutely nothing to do with the issue, (The Czar's misguidedness, waste, carbonization), which you seem to have no problem with??. Yet, you write about that very concern.and seem to have a smattering of Climate Activists narrative in your post.
This whole narrative is moronic in nature.
Hannity is yapping this up almost every day.
I am against filling our atmosphere with carbon.
Yet I sit here waiting to board my flight.
What I am for is that work be done so that I can in future board a flight that pumps out no carbon (or at least much less).
And certainly the next generation will look back at fossil fuels in ...[text shortened]... ore environmentally friendly.
For you as a capitalist to play the rich vs poor card is laughable.
Very conflicting stuff. So are you OK with what he is doing, while you worry and worry about how to fix what he is doing?
I believe all you libs are becoming a bit unglued, but it is not your fault. If Biden were MY president, I would be apoplectic!
Hannity? Is this you, Sonhouse? Jesus.
@averagejoe1 said
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
@averagejoe1 saidRepublicans are blocking clean energy laws that fix problems like how much CO2 jets emit.
His whole message as climate czar is to restrict carbon emissions. He is obviously a hypocrite, which we can jeehaw about, but more to my point, why do you libs, here on the Forum, just let this happen with no comment to at least chide him for it? Why are you all that way? Are you disingenuous? Do you write with Suzianne in concert, to confuse all issues, smoke screens, etc? Can you not simply acknowledge the wrong in this?
Republicans block renewable energy then complain about carbon emissions. POS, of them.
@averagejoe1 saidNo, no, no !!!
with respect, your post says absolutely nothing to do with the issue, (The Czar's misguidedness, waste, carbonization), which you seem to have no problem with??. Yet, you write about that very concern.and seem to have a smattering of Climate Activists narrative in your post.
Very conflicting stuff. So are you OK with what he is doing, while you worry and worry abou ...[text shortened]... If Biden were MY president, I would be apoplectic!
Hannity? Is this you, Sonhouse? Jesus.
Talking about who is flying around in a private jet, commercial jet (business class and economy) is not addressing the issue.
Nor is talking about Trump flying Air Force One to play golf.
That is part of our transportation infrastructure.
What we need to talk about is improving the infrastructure.
Not finger pointing who is using the current infrastructure.
There are many members of any government using the current mode of travel.
That's why your thread is moronic.
I'm sure that a future GOP Climate CZAR (as you like to call it) will be just sitting in the same aircraft.
We just won't know what he/she does for a living.
@vivify saidNo, no, no. Y’all are all alike. Biden closes pipelines and covers for his boy.
Republicans are blocking clean energy laws that fix problems like how much CO2 jets emit.
Republicans block renewable energy then complain about carbon emissions. POS, of them.
But this thread is about none of that. What do you think about czar John Kerry dumping tons of CO2. That is the question. Leon de Caprio et al dump CO2 as well, but I did not write about him.
John Kerry. Private jet. Your thoughts.